User talk:Yusuflittlecutie

May 2015
Hello, I'm Piguy101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Doutzen Kroes because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. π♂101 (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doutzen Kroes. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Doutzen Kroes was changed by Yusuflittlecutie (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952329 on 2015-05-15T23:18:09+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Doutzen Kroes, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. π♂101 (talk) 23:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Doutzen Kroes. π♂101 (talk) 23:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emigdio Mercier


A tag has been placed on Emigdio Mercier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. π♂101 (talk) 23:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. – Gilliam (talk) 03:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)