User talk:Yuvasachin

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. utcursch | talk 17:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 14:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bhakti Shakti 1.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bhakti Shakti 1.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhakti Shakti 1.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bhakti Shakti 1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Shivaji
Please stop removing the image from the article on Shivaji. The intent of image is not religious connotation, it enhances the encyclopedic value of the article. utcursch | talk 09:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Utkarsh.. You are spreading false history of our King. Please stop this nonsense immediately. Why are you attaching Godess image with the Shivaji.

Real history is that while coming from Konkan area in Sawantwadi Shivaji Raje has brought the sword from a person called Kudalkar. Shivaji Raje has purchased it from him and shown to mother Jijamata.. Later Jijamata has given it back to him and told to use it for making Swarajya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuvasachin (talk • contribs)


 * Firstly, that image has not been added or uploaded by me. Secondly, the image is not being used to depict anything historical -- it's being used to enhance enyclopedic value of the article -- Bhavani was the tutelary deity of Shivaji. Thirdly, I'm not a Hindu; I'm an atheist. Please stop removing that image just because you're opposed to Hinduism. utcursch | talk 10:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

It's not question that who opposed the hinduism and who not. Main question is whatever you are putting on this site about our King, It must me based on true history, so as a history researcher and spokesman I request you not to put that false image here.

Speedy deletion of Shivdharma
A tag has been placed on Shivdharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)