User talk:Yuvraj rathore2424

About Akshay Kumar
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Akshay Kumar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into King of Versatility. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robby (talk) 06:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of King of Versatility
Hello Yuvraj rathore2424,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged King of Versatility for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page] and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Yee no  (talk) 🍁 04:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Akshay Kumar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Akshay Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Akshay Kumar. - Arjayay (talk) 11:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Atrangi Re. ''Please do not change the cast order. They are listed as per screen credits.'' Ab207 (talk) 06:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Atrangi Re.  Ravensfire  (talk) 03:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Atrangi Re shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You are at three reverts. Do NOT make the change again without consensus on the talk page - you need to start that discussion, see WP:BRD. If you revert again, you will be reported for edit-warring.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 03:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Atrangi Re
Please do not alter the cast listing again as it is against the rules. You may be blocked by an administrator if you do so again.  Gerald WL  15:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Atrangi Re. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 14:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Atrangi Re. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion - Jan 18 2022
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Long term edit warring, no response to warnings. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=1066539628&oldid=1066522712 Constant reverting on the same article after two previous blocks for the same. See the report at WP:AN3]. EdJohnston (talk) 21:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)