User talk:Yxrivm/Evaluate an Article

The lead section is short and concise, which makes it easier to understand what the rest of the article is about. The content is good, but needs more information further provide context on the short stories and the impact to the novel overall. The article is well-written and it does maintain a neutral tone, so it is important to keep that up moving forward. There are multiple references listed in the references section, and they do seem to be scholarly and peer-reviewed references. The Talk Page does have some conversations relating to improvements that should be made to the article so that it can best disperse accurate information to the public, such as adding summaries to the seven short stories. Overall, the article is well-written but it definitely has room for improvement.Yxrivm (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)