User talk:Yycyvr

WestJet
Hello, thanks for your edits to WestJet, however you continuously remove important referenced material. You are welcome to add new information, but would need to provide a reason to delete the existing info. Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Your information is in error. Given that I worked on the interline for WestJet I have first hand knowledge. The articles that you quote are in error including that quoting Richard Bartrem.

Not surprising as WestJet seems to be embarrassed about not getting the res system working. First aiRes write down for $31 million. The OpenSkies upgrade not working. The Sabre fumble. 5 years an counting to get interline working like legacy airlines.

WestJet
Now why are you reverting my edit about Korean Air and Emirates? It is in the source. You need to provide reasons for your reverts or further action will be taken. Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Your comment adds nothing to the article as Korean and Emirates are part of the 70 that have been in consideration since 2006. The list is long including Air India, Air China (Not China Airlines which is already in partnership), China Eastern, Pakistan Air, El Al, Turkish Air. I have 2 boxes of business cards from all the airlines I met with.

Meanwhile your deletions removed material first hand information about WestJet and interline that I know first hand. I do not need to footnote myself. If you doubt me just contact Sewell Pon at WestJet or better yet Akira Mori at Japan Airlines and YC Wang at China Airlines.
 * That's all well and fine but it easier for everyone when they can just look at the article instead of making random phone calls. While I do believe you about these airlines we can't source something that is not written on another third-party website. Since Korean Air and Emirates were, what's the point of removing that info? Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. --RrburkeekrubrR 00:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. HkCaGu (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank-you HkCaGU. Please note that Thank-youBaby keeps deleting the section on the implications of the aiRes cancellation on Airlines Partnerships as well as the fact that WestJet has been in discussions with the same 70 airlines since 2006. I know this because I was the manager that originated those discussions in 2006. I can verify this by providing email addresses from the managers of the airlines which I communicated with. To not include this would be misrepresenting the facts. Something investors in WestJet should be aware of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.89.19.6 (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)