User talk:Yzd.exe

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Azd. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Arab states of the Persian Gulf
Please revert your changes at and take your concerns to the talk page. Also, don't accuse others of nonsense such as 'nationalistic toxicity', that is highly inappropriate and can get you blocked. There are rules on this site, which you are atm breaking (please see WP:CON, WP:STATUSQUO, WP:EW, WP:COMMONNAME, WP:NPOV, WP:NPA). This is not a platform to push your personal opinion. It is named the Persian Gulf (not Arabian Gulf) here for a reason - this seems like a WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT case. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Names are objective, there is no definite name and some places or countries like the United States or Europe, as well as the gulf states prefer to use another name, and for this Wikipedia page to be robust and fool proof, it should not push one perspective over another larger perspective. There is no such absolute name. And yes, that is nationalistic toxicity because you try to prevent any Arabian history from going out, just like what you did with the Hashashins page. This is like trying to prevent someone from mentioning that the Khawarizmi is Persian, it’s toxic, it’s bias, it is vandalism. Yzd.exe (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Arab states of the Persian Gulf
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Yzd.exe. Can you explain why you should not be indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia? You don't seem to have any intention of following our policies. This is unfortunate, because you probably have some knowledge to contribute. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Continued edit warring
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Continued edit warring. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a new complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Your second 3RR violation was at the Order of Assassins. EdJohnston (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)