User talk:Z13121

January 2023
Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The edits made by this account on the Mid-Level Practitioner page are intended to objectively describe the nuances of the term. Perhaps your idea of "neutral" is in fact biased in a different direction. If you have comments about the authenticity of any of the edits this account made, specify which part and the account would be happy to engage in discussion. Z13121 (talk) 23:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * We cannot label terminology 'controversial' based only on the word of an advocacy group. MrOllie (talk) 23:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * It was listed as controversial before this account edited the page. The controversy is supported by many disciplines. Hence the table. Z13121 (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * There was no breach of formal tone or neutrality. Your interpretation of the writing is by definition subjective. Your opinion cannot count more than another account's. Z13121 (talk) 23:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC)