User talk:Z1exa

Hi, I don't doubt that the company exists, but there are several problems:
 * 1) it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. The company's own sites are not independent
 * 2) It read like an advertisement, rather than a neutral encyclopaedia article. Eg, The company is geared to identify and implement ideas without parallel in the Russian market. is an unsourced spammy page.
 * 3) It's spammy to give direct links to commercial websites like those of your clients. Link to their wiki articles if they have them or not at all. Wikipedia isn't a link farm  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fast Lane Ventures


The article Fast Lane Ventures has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not justify notability - possibly just an advert.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reichsfürst (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * As you see, there are still problems, all the spamlinks in the portfolio section are still there, the text for the heverest one in particular is obvious spam. I'll let it go for now to give you a chance to rewrite, but I can't speak for other admins  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  18:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * That's better, but I think you still need to go through the text with a fine-tooth comb to make it as encyclopaedic as possible. It is bound to attract further scrutiny because the removal of the speedy tag by Vladimir will be listed by a bot (that doesn't mean it's wrong, just that removal is often not a good faith edit, so it's flagged up)  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fast Lane Ventures


A tag has been placed on Fast Lane Ventures, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Evaders99 (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Fast Lane Ventures for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fast Lane Ventures, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Fast Lane Ventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)