User talk:Z554


 * Unless you are specific and actually address the behaviour that got you blocked, I really can't see anyone accepting an unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

appealing block
At this point, I think you'd need to appeal at WP:AN. If you post said appeal here, someone should be able to copy it there. Please reread the WP:GAB. Looks like I restored TPA. Please choose your words carefully as it is possible to deepen the hole one is in.. I'll continue to watch this page, but I'm busy in real life. Here's a thought. I'll look at the UTRS tickets and see if there's anything useful.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)


 * ¡ay caramba!-- --from UTRS.  Look. These are the sort of blaming-others personal attacks that result in declines. For goodness sake, stop doing that. 


 * You must own your behvior, clearly and succinctly. You must describe how it was not appropriate. You must state, clearly and succinctly, what you would do in similar circumstances instead of blaming others and making personal attacks. It does not matter to the reviewer if you think someone else was wrong or worse too. All that matters is that you convince us your behavior will not again become disruptive.


 * Please do as I have said in your next unblock appeal. Your current tack will lead you to loss of talk page access and loss of UTRS.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * In reviewing your block log and talk, I see that you've omitted a couple of issues.  You were blocked for violation of WP:1RR on WP:ARBPIA pages and there is mention of block evasion/socking. Please do also address these issues in your next unblock request. Given all the material removed from your talk page, there may be other issues I don't know about. -- Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 14:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Z554&oldid=870302023 '''Note to reviewing admins. Permalink to that which went before].'''-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:GOODFAITH, being a fundamental belief of Wikipedia, should have been enough for any administrator to accept my statement that I would henceforth follow the rules of Wikipedia. It has not. It appears I am to present myself to my own Auto-da-fe where I alone am to atone for my sins - and all other editors and admins who obviously gamed the system - are not to be held to amount or accept responsibility for their violation of rules as I am required, years later. To reiterate, I have stated that I will obey the Rules of the Wikipedia platform. That should be enough for any administrator. If it is not, then I will accept a ban and be done with it. Z554 (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)


 * No. Never is. Never has been. You must demonstrate understanding of the "rules" or else we cannot expect you to adhere to them. Your persistence in not 1) identifying where you went astray and 2) not identifying what you will do differently indicates you are either unwilling or unable to understand and adhere to the "rules". So accept that as an either/or prerequisite. I, for one, am quite willing to have done with you.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 08:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * You are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests while still blocked, so I have reinstated them for you, above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

My cleanup is your removal - got it. Another violation of WP:GOODFAITH. You fail to obey to the rules that you demand I follow. I'm done with you and your dissimulation. Wikipedia is a cesspool of anti-Semitism. I accept a ban. Z554 (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * As you have resorted once again to making accusations of anti-Semitism, which was largely the reason behind your block in the first place, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)