User talk:ZC5ive

May 2017
Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gender pay gap in Australia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sky Warrior  02:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gender pay gap in Australia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Your "source" was just a link to the edit window; also be aware that (ironically) Wikipedia cannot be used as a reliable source for your edits. Please also be aware that personal attacks is prohibited; calling me a "retarded feminist" is most certainly a violation of WP:NPA. Thank you. Sky  Warrior''  03:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I'm going to explain my reversion of your edit at Gender pay gap in Australia. Long story short, please, instead of inserting your POV into the article, start a discussion on the talk page. Continuing this behavior could result in a block. Thank you. Sky Warrior  02:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The text is in a non-neutral tone. All edits must be in a neutral point of view, and your edit was not.
 * Most of the edit is pretty much original research, regardless if you provided sources or not.
 * Your sources aren't considered reliable per WP:RS.
 * The first source is just an explanation of how the calculator works, and doesn't actually support your statements.
 * The second and third sources link to Wikipedia articles, which can't be used as reliable sources.
 * The fourth source didn't work, and as such can't be used.
 * Please read WP:CIVIL.