User talk:ZDOGGYX47

Welcome!
Hello, ZDOGGYX47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Stitch's Great Escape! has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome.  McDoob AU93  15:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stitch's Great Escape!, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''The attraction has not officially closed down permanently. If Disney still has the official website up, but the attraction is not operating, then it's considered standing but not operating.'' –WPA (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 5 albert square (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Stitch's Great Escape, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You continue to add something uncited to this article, despite numerous warnings, and even a block. Resuming your edit-war immediately after coming off a block is considered very bad form. --''  McDoob AU93  14:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Avatar: Flight of Passage


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Avatar: Flight of Passage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GammaRadiator (talk) 14:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Walt Disney's Carousel of Progress has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Walt Disney's Carousel of Progress was changed by ZDOGGYX47 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942988 on 2017-05-03T13:51:31+00:00.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Walt Disney's Carousel of Progress ‎. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish. Please use the sandbox, not articles, to figure out how Wikimarkup works.''  78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 14:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Speedy deletion nomination of Epcot Forever


A tag has been placed on Epcot Forever, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Once the event gains traction, then it should be notable since it's replacing IllumiNations: Reflections of Earth. You should read WP:NOTYET first. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Skeppy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Skeppy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 01:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

About the article Zak Ahmed, things that could help
You haven't cited much information and it is a good idea to add an Youtuber infobox, which will vastly improve the detail of this article. Also I can see the headings you tried to do, that didn't work, so I will do a fix on that. I can help if you want, on the article, as I know some things about this person. You should also expand on the events he does, as it is a big part of his channel and I don't think you put much significance into it. Feel free to go to my talk page, and we can collaborate on your draft. Skappy (talk) 18:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zak Ahmed (September 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zak Ahmed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zak Ahmed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zak_Ahmed Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Zak_Ahmed reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The Enchanted Tale of Beauty and the Beast moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Enchanted Tale of Beauty and the Beast, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬  18:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Enchanted Tale of Beauty and the Beast
Hello, ZDOGGYX47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Enchanted Tale of Beauty and the Beast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Enchanted Tale of Beauty and the Beast


Hello, ZDOGGYX47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Enchanted Tale of Beauty and the Beast".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alife oaks


A tag has been placed on Alife oaks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Chlod (say hi!) 14:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Your edit to Alife oaks has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 14:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zak Ahmed
Hello, ZDOGGYX47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zak Ahmed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC) ==Your recent change at girge fployd is vadmalsim, do not do it again.Slatersteven (talk) 18:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 18:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zak Ahmed


Hello, ZDOGGYX47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zak Ahmed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)