User talk:Zaainlive

June 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Zaainlive. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion,  because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Syrthiss (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

. You've tagged several articles for deletion, but you've done so in such a way that they will not actually be deleted. So I'm going to ask you to stop. If you wish to have these articles deleted, please tell me exactly why - is the subject non notable? Is there some factual inaccuracy? I'm happy to set up the process for you, and to walk you through the steps necessary, but I can't speculate as to why you believe these articles are in need of deletion. Please stop blanking the articles and assist - continued blanking of the articles, even if you believe that they should be deleted, can be seen as disruptive. Post your comments here, if you like, I'll watch the page. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Since I haven't heard from you, I removed the two AFD templates from the artist's article and that of the album. I'm happy to start the AFD process for you on both articles, if you like, but I need to know from you why you believe they should be deleted. I don't want to guess your reasons and get it wrong - and, in this way, the debate will have the full 7 days to develop a consensus. As before, you can post here or on my talk page and I'll respond. Thanks! UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)