User talk:Zabadinho

Speedy deletion nomination of Albums produced by Niggaracci
A tag has been placed on Albums produced by Niggaracci requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Good grief, what are you doing?! Oh, it's nothing
Hello. While I'm not convinced of the usefulness of the large numbers of edits you're making with the WP:NUX_CC project (it's not exactly clear what your change goals are), I think it would be nice to have your edits marked as minor, especially when it has to do with adding and subtracting spaces, as in this edit, where I first noticed your work. Thanks and good luck. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 19:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Public Enemy
Hi, thanks for writing about Public Enemy. Do you know when they signed up Brian Hardgroove? --Uncle Ed (talk) 23:11, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

June 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Steven Spielberg filmography. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Please take it to the talk page rather than using summaries like "So what" and "You are nuts" --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
 * As we seem to havre resolved the issue, I've withdrawn my complaint. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Guðsþegn. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contributions to Hit-Boy because it didn't appear constructive. Blanking large portions of an article's content without giving a reason is not good form, and in fact unacceptable. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- Guðsþegn (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)