User talk:Zach6627

January 2024
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Jeremy Fragrance have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey, I appreciate the feedback, could you please provide more information on what exactly you mean by constructive.  Zach6627 (talk) 00:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Constructive is a general and non-specific term, referring generally to edits perceived to be advancing the mission of the encyclopaedia. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe that my edit is advancing the mission of this encyclopedia and meets the 3 principles of this site. Meeting the requirements: neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research. My edit has no bias and clearly states important factual information about Jeremy's life and sexuality. It is verifiable as there is a cited video where Jeremy himself makes the claim. Finally, there is no original research, as the video provided is an archive of the now deleted video his comments originate from. I believe that in line with the quote, "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing.—Jimmy Wales". Is realized with my edit, which is part of the sum of knowledge regarding Jeremy Fragrance, and important to anyone trying to better understand his personal life and sexuality. Zach6627 (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Those are three of the most basic principles of Wikipedia; they are not the only ones.
 * Information on Wikipedia should be notable. Information about someone's masturbation habits (unless those masturbation habits are somehow massively relevant to their public persona, a situation I'm struggling to imagine coming up very often) is not notable, and violates the specific regulations governing how living persons may be written about on Wikipedia. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Understandable, thank you for your time. Zach6627 (talk) 00:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)