User talk:Zach Joe Vega

Zach, I deleted two recent articles of yours, Zach Vega, which failed to assert the notability or significance of its subject, and Kelpsi, which strongly appears to be a hoax. Please contact me if I was in error. Thanks.--Kchase T 21:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

CoCo Put
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Cookfnburg, Kansas
A tag has been placed on Cookfnburg, Kansas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr Stephen 23:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Kansas
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 23:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Coofnburg, Kansas
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Iced Kola 23:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Jan 2007 - Blocked, 48 hours
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 00:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)