User talk:Zachariah62

Speedy deletion nomination of Mosaic authorship evidence article
A tag has been placed on Mosaic authorship evidence article, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Torah
Is the existing quote from the Encyclopedia Judaica incorrect? Please do not change the quoted text unless you have access to the work and the quote does not repeat what the work says. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 22:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, Zachariah62, it's good to see that you're diving right in to contribute and, more importantly, that you seem to be improving upon prior editing practices by beginning to discuss some issues with other editors. Reaching consensus, especially about controversial issues, is an important process here. You can further improve the successfulness of your edits by familiarizing yourself with the information and resources provided in the "welcome" message placed on your talk page by Jojhutton. --Rich Janis (talk) 10:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mosaic authorship evidence series
A tag has been placed on Mosaic authorship evidence series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 22:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

August 2010
The following warning was inappropriately placed and based on this this good faith edit. There was an attempt to close this section, but it has been reopened twice.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 20:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

It was hardly inappropriately placed. It was previously explained how this users edit was not okay, and he persisted following the warning. There is no good faith after a warning has been issued. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 00:15, 21 August 2010 (UTC)