User talk:ZacharyAHanson/Black Judaism/Yassen02 Peer Review

Lead Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? it is concise

Content Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? '''Yes, I feel that the content added is very much so relevant to the topic. The article topic is Black Judaism and the content that has been added is Black Judaism in North America. North America contains a great amount of Black Judaism and the history behind that is essential to understanding Black Judaism in its entirety.''' Is the content added up-to-date? Yes Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Maybe if there was a little bit more elaboration on how Judaism was introduced to African Americans in North America then it would help more with the content. Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Tone and Balance Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content added has a neutral tone to it and doesn't show any biasm. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? '''No, the content provided gives a background on what Black Judaism in North America is. It doesn't leave out or skimp out on information that is presented but also doesn't address too much of one topic.''' Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? '''The content that was added shows that there is no desire to persuade any party of anything. The content added shows that the information being shared is purely for the purpose of spreading non-biased knowledge of Black Judaism in North America. ''' Sources and References Guiding questions:

Is all-new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes Are the sources current? Yes Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Check a few links. Do they work? Yes Organization Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No Are images well-captioned? No Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No For New Articles Only If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Yes it does Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? no Overall impressions Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes What are the strengths of the content added? They give a well-needed perspective of what Judaism looked like for Black/ African American people. How can the content added be improved? If there were pictures I feel that would help a lot in creating a more holistic view of the information.