User talk:ZacharyMorgan

Proposed deletion of Chiddy bang
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chiddy bang, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Fails WP:BAND. References consist only of blogs and the like, failing WP:RS

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chiddy bang
I have nominated Chiddy bang, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chiddy bang. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chiddy bang has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. 02:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

re: Chiddy bang

 * Hi ZacharyMorgan, Please note: the text you just removed was titled:   Please respect this      02:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Chiddy bang
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chiddy bang, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Chiddy bang appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chiddy bang has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chiddy bang and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Chiddy bang with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chiddy bang.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

re: Your Message
Hi ZacharyMorgan, I've left a response to your message on my talk page --     02:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)