User talk:Zacharyhbennett/sandbox

I like the new section you added, "Dissent Under the Santa Anna Dictatorship". It is clear, concise, and without opinion. In my article, I found it easier to start new sections than to add to others because its hard to connect the information and continue the last editor's flow, but you seemed to do it well. However, some additions, like the last one in "Aftermath", may need some work to get your work to flow with the other editors. But these are small changes and can be easily remedied.

˜˜˜Camden McCusker

-Are there any parts of Mexican history that are underdeveloped or not discussed enough?

-Are there any demographic groups whose historical contributions are not discussed enough?

-Do I have enough sources, and where should I turn to to get sources that will improve my work?

-Do I exhibit any bias when discussing the historical figures involved?

Note that the bolded text was posted by other editors, and the non-bolded text is my original ideas. I added both so that I could create a coherent flow. Keep in mind that I ran out of time while turning my notes into sentences, so the final article will be about twice as long as the current rough draft.Zacharyhbennett (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)