User talk:Zachcorr1

Zachcorr1

Speedy deletion nomination of United states v downs


A tag has been placed on United states v downs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 03:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of State v quattlebaum


The article State v quattlebaum has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable case, there are more notable cases at the Federal level that concern the issue of attorney/client privilege.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 03:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United states v downs


The article United states v downs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 03:56, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Court cases
When writing about court cases, it would be very helpful if you could indicate in what way the case is notable. Since Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information, the information that is here should be significant somehow. For example, the State v Quattlebaum case that you added appears notable as a significant precedent in South Carolina case law. However, the other cases you've added do not seem so significant. If you could add some information as to their significance, great! Otherwise, they're likely to be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of United states v downs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United states v downs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United states v downs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of State v. TAPP for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article State v. TAPP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/State v. TAPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)