User talk:Zacheyman

Image source problem with Image:YoungMark.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:YoungMark.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Mark Rudman
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mark Rudman, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.markrudman.com, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mark Rudman and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mark Rudman with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mark Rudman.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Mark Rudman/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Mark Rudman saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Philip Cross (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Permission
Hi. I thought I would answer here because you've been gone such a long time. My talk page sees a lot of traffic, and messages are automatically archived within a few days.

Yes, if Mr. Rudman is willing to verify permission for the content we can use it, although it is often necessary for the material modified after permission is provided. What is appropriate for Mr. Rudman's website may not be exactly in keeping with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Either of the methods above will work, except that since the message was left for you we have changed our licensing requirements. At this point, content must be licensed compatibly with Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 Unported. We request that it also be licensed under GFDL, but under the circumstances this is not essential.

If Mr. Rudman verifies permission through e-mail, the article should be restored once that e-mail is approved and processed. If he releases it at the website, please leave a link to the release at my talk page, and I'll bring it back. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)