User talk:Zackaback

Welcome!

 * }

February 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Marge Simpson. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. C T J F 8 3 03:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Linda Belcher


A tag has been placed on Linda Belcher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Kamkek (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gene Belcher


A tag has been placed on Gene Belcher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cousins Subs, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Safari (web browser). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gold Renet  10:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Fox Entertainment Group, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect information
I notice you have recently been making small edits to articles on companies. In future can you please make an extra effort to check that your additions are factually accurate - on a number of occasions (e.g. here, here, here and here) I have reverted your edits because they added information that was not correct. Best, Gr1st (talk) 18:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at IBM, you may be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 20:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Meg Griffin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. / edg ☺ ☭ 22:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Capcom
It is stylized as all-caps, but it's not really like that. Stop making it "CAPCOM". It's just "Capcom".  TheStickMan [✆Talk] 00:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Branding
Please stop branding technology-related articles (by changing Microsoft to Microsoft Corporation, for example). If you continue I will have an administrator block you from editing.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Concerns
Hello, it has come to my attention that editors have raised issues with some of your edits. It appears that all of your edits have been made in good faith; however, you should address some of the concerns raised by other editors. Additions of "Corporation" after every instance of the word "Microsoft" are relatively unnecessary. Perhaps you could use your interest in Microsoft to assist the project in other ways. Many articles could use more references for verification. For an easy to use guide on citing sources on Wikipedia, check out referencing for beginners. In addition, there are some articles on Microsoft products, which are stubs. One I have found it Microsoft Office Accounting. Another is Creative Writer 2. You could greatly help the encyclopedia by adding information found in reliable, third party sources. Just remember, always keep the five pillars in mind. Happy editing, Ryan Vesey Review me!  17:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Hi Zackaback. Your editing pattern is becoming disruptive, and I notice you have not made any edits to the talk space of wikipedia. This implies to me that you are not aware of or do not care about policies regarding discussion and consensus. If you carry on with the same behavior without discussion - you are likely to be blocked from editing. Please ensure that you reply to this message in some way shape or form. WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 17:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop making wide changes that you have been previously told not to do, thanks, Atomician (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 hour for as you are unwilling to communicate with the editors on this page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 17:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for as you still will not communicate. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 19:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note (to any administrator) that Zackaback can be unblocked as soon as he starts communicating.  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 19:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)