User talk:Zaheer Don Zaheer Don

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sadie Katz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sadie Katz was changed by Zaheer Don Zaheer Don (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854419 on 2020-11-14T10:35:04+00:00

Nomination of Babbu Rana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babbu Rana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Babbu Rana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Dtt1 Talk  12:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Personal opinions
Hi there, re: this, your efforts are appreciated, but please avoid adding interpretive content in articles. You can describe what can be seen, but when you make a comparison to another series, or describe something as ludicrous or talk about who provides comic relief, we are heavily in interpretive territory. Maybe it will be helpful to see how I changed it. See here. Please also see our policy on original research. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Babbu Rana
Hello, Zaheer Don Zaheer Don,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Babbu Rana, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Babbu Rana


A tag has been placed on Babbu Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Babbu Rana. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - FitIndia  Talk Admin on Commons 07:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The new article was essentially identical to the deleted article. To show notability, you need to present independent reliable sources with significant coverage of this actor. Not gossip sites, not YouTube videos, not his employer's personal website. As he seems only known for Khabardaar, I really doubt such coverage exists. You don't need to only use English sources though. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Aap Kay Sitaray moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Aap Kay Sitaray, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aap Kay Sitaray
Hello, Zaheer Don Zaheer Don. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aap Kay Sitaray, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Sardar Kamal (actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sardar Kamal (actor), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Sardar Kamal (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Jawan userbox
You can use this userbox if you want by using this code  Tousif  ❯❯❯  Talk  04:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haohmaru (Soulcalibur).png
Thanks for uploading File:Haohmaru (Soulcalibur).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Becky Lynch
WWE Day of Reckoning 2 and WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2007 Stacy and Torrie were there on the cover respectively of WWE games, 2K games being seperate from THQ era games is not WP:Notable, so please comply with guidlines in the article rather than WP:Fancruft! I watch since 1999 and am also more experienced in Wikipedia than you, if you have further queries seek WP:DR and this is not a place to fanboy over Becky Lynch. I see you receieved previous warnings for adding personal opinions. Dilbaggg (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I have opened a talk pafe discussion on the matter on Becky Lynch, please gain consensus before adding this. I respect that you are a huge Becky Lynch fan, but in Wikipedia we only add facts and support WP:Neutral views. Good day. Dilbaggg (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)