User talk:Zahurzaidi

Welcome!
Hello, Zahurzaidi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister  talk  03:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see What Wikipedia is not for further details). Thank you. SwisterTwister  talk  04:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Your numerous Tribune links appear to be a blog and are in any case written by you, so either way they are not acceptable.
 * you gave some references, but they appear to be either dead or spam links to book reviews or sales pages. They were also not in-line so we couldn't tell what fact each is supporting even if they were real references. Without independent in-line third party sources, I can't tell if you meet our criteria or not
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: 1999 Zahur planned and executed a comprehensive campaign... This operation was recognized as the first and the most comprehensive campaigns... Zahur Zaidi is credited with planning and introducing a Community Policing system that led to a drastic reduction in crime in Kullu town. This scheme became a model for Community Policing in the State due to its commendable results and was later implemented in the Himachal Pradesh State in 2001... making it unique and much ahead of its times and many of its features were adopted by other Police websites in India...&mdash;and so on throughout the article. It's shameless self promotion with no reliable sources to verify any of what you claim
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to book sales sites, your plays or YouTube
 * the article was largely created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

You have a conflict of interest when editing this article. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest and WP:Autobiography.

Don't remove speedy deletion tags yourself, or add protection templates to unprotected pages.

If you still think that you meet our notability criteria and can find proper references, and you want to try again, I'll post the deleted text to a user subpage for you to work on, just let me know. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, there is no automatic right to a Wikipedia article, please carefully read the message by SwisterTwister  above, particularly the last paragraph Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)