User talk:Zainmehm7/sandbox/final

Final Review
Hi Zain, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article would benefit from better proofreading. There are incomplete sentences, and the tone is at times editorializing. 4 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article does not follow the suggested template and it is difficult to scan it for information due to the lack of headers or any structure. 1 point.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: There are a few references at the end, but almost none of the claims within the article are sourced. 1 point.
 * 5) Relevance: The information is for the most part relevant. 5 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 978/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 2 points.

The final score is 18/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)