User talk:Zaku kai

AfD on blueprints
Hello Zaku kai, I'm looking at this post. You might want to call it AfD, not RfD. I believe RfD is Redirects for discussion. Maybe in the past RfD stood for something else? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 20:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * D'oh! I was thinking "Requests for Deletion"  :)  How clumsy of me.  Zaku kai 21:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

you really need to discuses a deletion before going through with it. the gundam article needs to keep all of its real world info.Jeffpiatt 03:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Dude, what the hell are you talking about? That bit about the S-Gundam was totally out of nowhere and had nothing to do with the Gundam.  "Oh, by the way, a different designer had a similar experience on a different project ten years later".  It is almost completely unrelated to the rest of the paragraph.  Put it in the S-Gundam article if you like, it has nothing to do with Okawara's process of designing the original Gundam.  Just the fact that the sentence had to begin in such a ridiculous way - "As a side note" - makes it clear that it doesn't belong.  If it belonged there, it wouldn't need to be a side note, it'd be a proper part of the paragraph.  And do learn how to write in discussion pages, please?  Zaku kai 03:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Kryptonite
Was the sarcasm in your edit summary really necessary? --GentlemanGhost 18:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

No. But it felt good. I'd just come off some edits to the Lex Luthor article that really made my head hurt... Zaku kai 01:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Planet killer
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I removed the prod for Planet Killer. I don't have a particular opinion on the page at the moment, but the article had previously been nominated for deletion, and thus WP:Prod doesn't apply. If you still feel that it warrants deletion, though, (and the discussion was a while ago in 2007), you can always nominate it for WP:AFD. - Bilby (talk) 23:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, OK. A bit confusing.  :) Zaku kai (talk) 04:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * It is, I'm afraid. :) The argument is that if the community previously discussed an article, and decided to keep it, it is no longer appropriate for a single person to request the article to be deleted via prod, and thus it has to return to AfD. It can still end up being deleted, and many article are - the process just needs to be open to community discussion. - Bilby (talk) 04:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)