User talk:Zalgo/Archives2008/May

I'm Done
You wont see me again. Hope I managed to put a smile on your face :-D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.190.45 (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

One-child policy
Not sure what was unconstructive about my edits to this article? Did you mean to warn another user? Louis Waweru Talk  01:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello again, I don't think the last message on my talk page is for me. I'm not trying to do anything with my username =) Louis Waweru  Talk  01:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Ashland Seminary
Hi, sorry about that. I am currently preparing to begin an entry for Ashland Theological Seminary. It should be up there shortly. I feel like a tourist (talk) 01:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Edit to Sexually transmitted diseases
I'm sorry. I wasn't trying to be unconstructive. I was trying to remove vandilism by someone else. .&#39;Rice Cakez&#39;. (talk) 01:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not trying to vandilize. I'm trying to remove the vandilsim. I'm so sorry for the misuunderstanding. .&#39;Rice Cakez&#39;. (talk) 01:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding. I'll try my best to get rid of vandilism. .&#39;Rice Cakez&#39;. (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Are you using a bot?
I think it may be acting up. My reverted edits and ricecakes were actually undoing vandalism. Louis Waweru Talk  01:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please double check what huggle is saying. Many of your recent edits are restoring vandalism. Louis Waweru  Talk  02:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hiatus hernia
- Hey, no offense, but I'm a bit confused as to why my recent change of "your" to "one's" (as first and second pronouns are awkward in encyclopedic tone) was reverted as possibly unconstructive. I'm going to assume it stood out in the recent changes because I didn't bother to log in for a one-word edit, which was probably another oddity, and that you are using a (semi)automated process; I'm not blaming you for distrusting an random anonymous edit (My fault there - I should write summaries more often, but I usually don't bother for small passing corrections while reading/researching), just thought I'd point that out to you. I changed it to "a patient's" to match the rest of the article, because, as a reader without this condition described, it's not "my" midsection being talked about. ~_^ --Cartoonmaster (talk) 02:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Edit: Actually, on second thought, that last part by the last anon. user is actually quite superfluous/redundant (For one, your stomach is obviously in your mid-body section, and two, this article focuses on the stomach. That's probably the reason why it looks so out-of-place and unprofessional there..) after I reread the context and edit history.  The glaring reference to me, the reader, ("you") was what bothered me there, and I sought to fix that when the phrase might as well be removed as a whole.  Nevertheless, I thought I'd drop a line to let you know.

P.S. - A convenient edit conflict between the time I posted the above section and my realization upon review of the article is the reason why my post appears down here below the post or two above, hence the retroactive (original) post time. Don't mind me, I'm being...actually, pretty unconstructive tonight myself, so far as homework progress goes.. ^_^; And with that, I'll go off and try not to continue my day's missing of details/directions and redoing previous unnecessary effort to bring me back to where I started. >_>; --Cartoonmaster (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Definition of Vandalizim
Please Explain to me how I am vandalizing when I am correcting mistakes I made during the creation of a page --Jcampbe

Mercy|Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.218.11 (talk) 00:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Anussati edit
Hi Cream!

First I want to thank you very much for so diligently and kindly following up on likely vandalism. Your efforts are very much appreciated!

Second, I just wanted to check in with you regarding a recently assessed "unconstructive" edit of the Anussati article that you reverted with a uw-huggle1 note -- just so you're aware of my adding to your effort. FWIW, after reviewing the reverted edit and its claims, I've deduced (perhaps wrongly?) that the edit was simply misformatted (using a header preceded by three "=" signs and followed by two such signs) as well as lacking needed citations. Thus, while I'm not sure the edit meritted a user-warning, I do believe reverting it was appropriate. I've gone into more detail regarding my thoughts on this at Talk:Anussati and left a brief statement following yours at User_talk:149.4.218.43. (FWIW, having likely met this anon user before [using a different IP address also from Queens College, NY, regarding similar content], I suspect he'll attempt to re-add the material tomorrow and the next day and the next ... until some form of detente is reached.)

I hope you don't mind my adding to your efforts here. And, again, thank you so much for your hard and thoughtful work. Best wishes, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 03:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey
How's it going brother? You're doing a great job - keep it up!

Joey Droll (talk) 14:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Colby-Sawyer
I'm sorry, I am a new user and am still just slightly confused with how Wikipedia works even after reading several how-to's and FAQs. I had asked a question on how to upload that image but was still confused on how to go about it. I thought I had selected the correct license option f that was the problem. Colby-Sawyer has no seal of higher quality available online. Can you help me make the logo change sustainable? Thanks. Pellsk (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

American School in Marrakech
I placed the Controversy information on the Discussion page, if this is appropriate, since so many citations are required. What do you think? Should it all go back in the article? And be verified from there? Am trying to avoid constantly reverting Friendofschool1Kitchawan (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

ZOMGIRC
hahahaha. Z i g g y  S a w  d u s t  00:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Fancy!
Loving the new user page layout dude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.180.177 (talk) 03:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

hello again
i am wondering when can i become an administrator?, i have not posted any offensive content at any time even before i got my username, can i be trusted to becoma and adminisator? Btzkillerv (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for being so biast
You know all I did was make one small paragraph in the discussion area to suggest if maybe there should be a section for those who believe in the unity of Hinduism & Sikhism and not as two seperate religions. And instead of being open minded to what I was saying you took it down becuase you thought it was unconstructive? Its just a suggestion. I mean I didnt act mean, or bad, or say anything disrespectful. I have the feeling your just someone whos so biast that you cant be open minded to my suggestion. And this is one of the many reasons why some people dont like wikipedia. Becuase people like you cant even handle one paragraph that maybe conflicts with your opinion. 71.105.82.152 (talk) 23:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you mean falst positive? I dont get what you mean?71.105.82.152 (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Thank you for being understanding :) 71.105.82.152 (talk) 23:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Why?
The text I added was correct. Maione is a frazione of Altilia. Please change it back. 75.157.203.16 (talk) 00:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I did it myself. 75.157.203.16 (talk) 00:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cream.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cream.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a new user
I appreciate that my vandalism was wrong (while a true opinion of many that screamo is rubbish) i have a problem with wikipedias all punishment approach. I had just reverted vandalism on the enter shikari page that appeared to have been there for about for days, yet i get no message saying "thankyou for reverting the vandalism on (page name), you have made wikipedia a better place" just some constructive criticism :P Blenky119 (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Be more cautious in your reverts
Please take the time to actually read my edits before you revert them.99.147.200.105 (talk) 23:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Socks
Hi there. As I noted Kyle Falconer is probably the most blatantly vandalised. If you look at the history of the article you can see several redlinked user names, all having made similar edits. Clicking on the contributions, you can see a pattern of articles being vandalised. He (assuming it is one person, which I believe it is) has added negative original research to various Scottish bands (e.g. Sergeant (band)) and vanity edits to Real Radio (although oddly he has also vandalised that page, as well as Q96). He has also vandalised various articles on peadophile‎s and murderers (e.g. Sidney Cooke). The problem is that the guy uses a new account every day, regardless of whether or not his previous sock is blocked. Today he used several accounts, continually edit warring on the Real Radio page. I decided to request protection because today he removed almost all the content from Kyle Falconer (without simply blanking the page, to avoid triggering a bot). Putting it all back in was a lot more annoying than a simple revert. He has also started to make his changes in several edits rather than one, again making it more akward to fix. Bridies (talk) 23:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Project H.A.M.M.E.R.
Hey, you might want to take a look at WP:PROD; removing the tag is the proper way to contest a PROD. Per WP:PROD, even if they remove it in bad faith, it's still not supposed to be re-added. Cheers, JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Adoption status
Effective immediately, I will no longer be able to serve as your mentor. Apologies for any inconvenience, and good luck. GlassCobra 22:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I assure you, it's nothing personal. I'm trying to re-align my priorities a bit, and I feel like you need a more hands-on mentor. GlassCobra 01:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

need help
i warned a guy who cussed my country in one of the edits, is it acceptable? his ip adress is 59.42.30.248 and his edits can be found here [] he keep sayin protest tibet independence and this really winds me up because he is cussin my country Btzkillerv (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Wikieditor222/Signatures
that page is not a guestbook. it is a page for all of my signitures. alright. Wikieditor222 (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank-spam
 , just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:User page
I thought you would ask. I saw your cmt earlier. I'm sorry but I am too busy. I will try to renovate your page as soon as I can. -- RyRy5  ( talk  ♠  Review ) 02:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I can make round corners and drop down boxes for informational userboxes. But I can asure you I can do the rest. It will take me a few days since I have other requests before you. -- RyRy5  ( talk  ♠  Review ) 02:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll find out how... Thanks! -- Crea m y! Talk 02:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Look at your userpage and add as much info as you can where needed. If you have any questions, just ask. I’m not done yet by the way. I just need you to do something is all -- RyRy5  ( talk  ♠  Review ) 03:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * An IP reverted my renovation. Do you mind reverting it back. Thanks. Regards, Ryan Cross  ( talk ) 04:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

User page
Cream, you know on your user page where it says "Please add info here Cream" at the toP? Well, do you mind doing that? I can't really continue renovating unless I know what size it would become, and some other stuff. Just put whatever you like there. I suggest adding what you do on wikipedia and a little about yourself. Questions? RyRy5 ( talk ) 00:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

lolz
>:3 love your userbox dude! Im gonna make an ED one me thinks. :) ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ (Ταλκ ) 03:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Sudoku
You rightly reverted User:198.53.129.181's edit to Sudoku trying to remove information that the puzzle was invented in America. Please note that the editor went back and removed all info proving this fact from that article and has also been trying to remove it from the Nikoli article as well. I've reverted the recent changes, but you might want to check on it to see that the person doesn't return again. DreamGuy (talk) 16:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Chef
" Hi, the recent edit you made to Chef (South Park) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Creamy!Talk 16:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)"

Just one problem,all i did was correct blatantly incorrect info.86.87.28.191 (talk) 18:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I was all like "lolwut"?
Double agent. Very nice.  Ziggy  Saw  dust  19:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Command centre
How were my edits vandalism? I spent half an hour writing the bit about Cold War command centres in Canada. If you're mistaken, I wouldn't mind it being reverted...
 * All better, thank you =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.39.15 (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Userpage
Did you see me recent message a few sections above this one? -- RyRy5 ( talk  ♠  copy-edit ) 00:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, just talk about your self and what you normally do here. I suggest taking a look at User Page Design Center/About you some suggestions. Also, your user page should look something like User:Perfect Proposal when finished.-- RyRy5 ( talk  ♠  copy-edit ) 00:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

My last comment
I accept your apology and I will revert that page back since It was meant as a good faith edit to begin with and I'll let you know I used the edit summary for any edit that was large and complicated to let people know it is a good faith edit and to help improve that page towards keeping it true to the plot, and getting rid of unnecessary information or limiting the amount of words needed. -71.59.237.110 (talk) 01:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Also just to note some of Gustav's edits had some spelling errors to many episodes of Jackie Chan Adventures and like you I also remove vandalism edits when I encounter them. -71.59.237.110 (talk) 01:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

vandalizing
I'll report u to WIkipedia next time u vandalize good articles or my talk page got that punk?--01:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes and ill ring up your ISP and tell them what a tool you are the next time you harrass any user again, lots of luck smartarse :-) Prom3th3an (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

monobook
yea, i took a look at your monobook - there's a lot in there! (I still prefer statusbot's automagic statusing, I always forget to manually change my status). thanks for burying the hatchet. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 14:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll have to take a closer look one day when I have more time. cheers, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 14:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Your vandalism
I see you enjoy inserting vandalism into articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VⅯNⅯNⅯV (talk • contribs) 01:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Generally, when all that’s on an article talk page is a bunch of [[Link title[[Media:

Example.ogg#REDIRECT $Insert text$]]]] Strike-through text and there’s no meaningful content in the page history, you’re supposed to blank it or delete it.


 * Oh, never mind, you’re that little kid I saw being talked about on WP:AN/I for abusing rollback or Twinkle. Lol, okay, I’ll just ignore you, then.--VⅯNⅯNⅯV (talk) 19:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Smile!
 Hello Zalgo/Archives2008, Prom3th3an has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Hello!
 Grace notes T § 23:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Userpage
I was wondering if you still wanted your user page redesigned. You reverted back to the old design.-- RyRy5 ( talk ) 01:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying. Regards, RyRy5  ( talk ) 01:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Revert?
Right now all hell has broken loose. This is on the news AND on the Weather Channel about the tornadoes. I-80 IS really CLOSED due to these things. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 01:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)