User talk:Zalhemai

Welcome!
Hello, Zalhemai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  22:08, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Zalhemai, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
The contributions made where good. They where relevant and based off of reliable sources. The effectiveness of the writing could be improved. Spend extra consideration on grammar and making the sentences more rhythmic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethaniehart (talk • contribs) 21:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

==Peer Review==

The writer of this article was able to pack a lot of information into this article about various different aspects of Cordoba. I think their introduction could've been more concise and given a more broad overview. Their article gives a lot of links to other wikipedia articles which is extremely helpful for the reader and allows them to go learn more since discussing the city is a large task to cover in just one wikipedia article. I did notice there are a couple of places where a wikipedia user has flagged some sentences to state that they need citations, so I think perhaps they could've understood what needs to be cited better. Their history section flows very nicely going through in chronological order. The geography section is clear and concise. I also really enjoyed the climate section as it a large piece of the cities history and information. For their architecture section, since this is divided into many subsections, I think there should've been an introduction to the architecture section to create interest and give context. However, I think they did a good job of providing lots of varying examples, although I wish they would've connected the architecture with the history. I also feel that the order of the sections was not given much thought. I feel the history should be followed by the architecture and perhaps the garden section, the geography section, and the climate section should be consecutive for better flow. All the photos are really great. The theatre section is lacking substance. In festivals and politics and governments and also in sports there are a few broken links. All in all, I think the writer of this article did a great job in providing a lot of information to readers. Despite some errors, I think this is a great article.Ab6047 —Preceding undated comment added 23:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)