User talk:Zambataro

Image tagging for Image:Kore.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kore.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Saint Clare School
I have added a "" template to the article Saint Clare School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG 22:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:San jose.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:San jose.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Saint Leo the Great School (California) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Leo the Great School (California) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saint Leo the Great School (California) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Merging parish articles into the diocese article
Hello! I have noticed that many of the parishes in the Diocese of San Jose have separate Wikipedia articles, most of them created by you. It appears that many, perhaps most, of these individual parish articles do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for a stand-alone article, in that they are not supported by significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. I have proposed merging most of these articles into the article Roman Catholic Diocese of San Jose in California. This means that the name of the parish would become a "redirect" which would take the reader to the diocese article. The history of the parish article would be preserved, so that it could be reviewed by any interested party, and the article could even be reconstructed if the parish was later found to be notable. You are welcome to comment on this proposal here. Please be aware that we appreciate your hard work in creating these articles and hope you will continue working to improve Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 17:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)