User talk:Zane Loke

Replaceable fair use File:The Portrait of Bernard Cheong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Portrait of Bernard Cheong.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 19:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Bernard Cheong Doctor Event 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bernard Cheong Doctor Event 2.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

"object of commentary"
I read
 * Uploading a non-free work, as object of commentary using File Upload Wizard

However, you provide no commentary at all on any of these photos.

Please compare File:Lunch-atop-a-skyscraper-c1932.jpg, the object of commentary within the article Lunch atop a Skyscraper. -- Hoary (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

impending deletions
I've nominated File:Bernard Cheong Event 1.jpg and File:The Bernard Cheong Portrait.jpg for speedy deletion. (Actually I could have simply deleted them, but I thought I'd leave them for at least a few minutes.) Neither qualifies as fair use. For each, you claim that


 * The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work.

Not only is the article as a whole not dedicated specifically to a discussion of either photo, neither photo is even referred to in passing. If you'd like to see what "dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work" is about, please read the section immediately above, about "object of commentary", which I had posted here before you again uploaded these files. -- Hoary (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Horay,

uploading pictures, seem too much selection, am worry my friend Bernard Cheong pictures/photo is been downloaded and misuse can you at least guide me how to do it or what to write when uploading.  posted at 11:52, 5 March 2015‎ by Zane Loke 


 * There are strict requirements for "fair use". Here, these requirements are not met. So you cannot upload the photographs to Wikipedia.


 * If Bernard Cheong is your friend, it should be easy for you to take a photo of him. Having taken a photo of him, you can release this work of yours via a suitable Creative Commons license and upload it to Wikimedia Commons. And then you can add this photo to an article about him. On how to add it to Wikimedia Commons: First_steps, 入門須知, or 初步教程. (Each of these links to alternative explanations in other languages.)


 * However, if Bernard Cheong is your friend, then please read Conflict of interest, 利益衝突, or one of the alternative explanations in other languages. -- Hoary (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)