User talk:Zanimum/Archive 20/Archive 19/Archive 13

Television program
Television program has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.  Czech Out  ☎ |  ✍  16:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of The Price Is Right pricing games
I have nominated List of The Price Is Right pricing games, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of The Price Is Right pricing games&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tara Schaeffer


The article Tara Schaeffer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Fails WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reconsider the static (talk) 01:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Book Brought to You by . . . Sesame Street.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Book Brought to You by . . . Sesame Street.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Ja Ga  talk 22:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TV tiny toons logo with buster bunny.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TV tiny toons logo with buster bunny.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zanimum! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 42 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Suzanne Crough -
 * 2) Elizabeth Macleod -
 * 3) P. Arthanari Swamy -
 * 4) Kenneth M. Dye -
 * 5) Richard N. Richards -
 * 6) Noel Ahipeaud -
 * 7) Jean-Marc de La Sablière -
 * 8) Jeff Douglas -
 * 9) Nicholle Tom -
 * 10) Daniel Davis -

11. Catherine Sutherland 12. Jenny Gear 13. Ed Vanwoudenberg 14. Rawat Tana 15. Joel Jeannot 16. Choke Yasuoka 17. Kurt Fearnley 18. Christie Dawes 19. Michonne Bourriague 20. Bonnie McKee 21. Ljubiša Samardžić 22. Mohammed Khathim Fayrouz Al-Hindawi 23. Abd Al-Sattar Al-Qat' Al-Abodi 24. Malik Abd Al-Hussein Ghafoori 25. Silvia Armeni 26. Altero Matteoli 27. Wang Tiande 28. Jin Jiangbo 29. Errol Louis 30. Luciano Borsato 31. Sherrie Rollins Westin 32. Sholom Gherman 33. Louie Ocampo 34. Mel Villena 35. Imani Patterson 36. Doris Baaten 37. Fred Meijer (actor) 38. Bill van Dijk 39. Terry Behrens 40. Doug Hall 41. Rosemarie Truglio 42. Carrie Finlay

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

RfD nomination of Harry Potter and the Green Flame Torch
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question)  01:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Macleod


The article Elizabeth Macleod has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:AUTHOR; no significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW ( Talk ) 21:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of P. Arthanari Swamy
A tag has been placed on P. Arthanari Swamy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NW ( Talk ) 21:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MySpace-Wikipedian
Template:MySpace-Wikipedian has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –xenotalk 14:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Terry Behrens


The article Terry Behrens has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, partially negative biography of a living person. Please do not remove this prod tag without sourcing the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW ( Talk ) 06:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed Khathim Fayrouz Al-Hindawi


The article Mohammed Khathim Fayrouz Al-Hindawi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not all candidates are notable. No evidence that this one is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rettetast (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Score: A Hockey Musical


The article Score: A Hockey Musical has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication the film is notable (especially since it's only in production)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Possible copyright infringement of Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Little_Muppet_Monsters, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Jim Henson's Little Muppet Monsters saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 68.217.118.42 (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tv lizzie mcguire globe.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tv lizzie mcguire globe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toronto Sun election coverage.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Toronto Sun election coverage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Project: Canadian Sport
I noticed you recently updated an article dealing with Sport in Canada. You might be interested to know that there is a project aimed at improving articles on this subject. Feel free to stop by and help out, we'd love to have you! HalifaxRage (talk) 11:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Books fishing for fun.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Books fishing for fun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toronto Sun election coverage.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Toronto Sun election coverage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Toronto Sun election coverage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Toronto Sun election coverage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 23:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Arctic.gnome has added the rationale, but could you please specify the source. (Did you scan, photograph, download, etc.) Thanks. Mind  matrix  00:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Nasa mer daffy.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Nasa mer daffy.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Urdu query
Hi. I answered your question at []. --Soman (talk) 15:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zombie Planet


The article Zombie Planet has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The film does not appear to meet the standards for notability in films. Please add reliable sources to prove otherwise.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim 1357  talk  03:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

question
Hello I created the page. I am wondering how you did this to get users to join.

ThanksChecker Fred (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Airforce bowling chief martin.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airforce bowling chief martin.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Airforce blur crosscountry.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airforce blur crosscountry.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

Speedy deletion nomination of Happy Meals
A tag has been placed on Happy Meals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bluemask (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Bluemask... I created this page in 2005 as a redirect to Happy Meal, it was only with the last few months it was turned into this totally separate (copyvio) article. --  Zanimum (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Stamp norway Niels Henrik Abel.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stamp norway Niels Henrik Abel.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

Proposed deletion of CinderElmo


The article CinderElmo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable enough on its own, despite its cast of famous actors. Simply a Sesame Street skit that doesn't have much more info.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Dream out loud (talk) 03:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * It's not merely a skit, it was a full special, later released on video internationally. --  Zanimum (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Removing a template from a file page
Why did you remove Non-free reduced from this file with ?--Rockfang (talk) 01:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

connectivity project for sowiki
Hallo, my name is Anastasiya Lvova, I'm "duty" in Connectivity project. The essence of the "Connectivity" project is to study and enhance the coherence of Wikipedia, or, in other words, to improve hypertext navigation between articles. The project deals with deadends, isolated articles, non-categorized articles, transitivity of the category tree, etc.

We want to work with sowiki, but we need configured so:MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage for it (with direct links to template namespace pages, for example, ru:MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage/de:MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage/fr:MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage). Is it possible to set it up for our usage?

thanks in advance, Lvova Anastasiya (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abd Al-Sattar Al-Qat' Al-Abodi


The article Abd Al-Sattar Al-Qat' Al-Abodi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I'm unable to find any information on the subject online, thus the article seems to fail WP:Verifiability. Seems to also fail WP:Notability for the same reason.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 01:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I've also tagged Malik Abd Al-Hussein Ghafoori for the same reason. Cheers --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 02:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles McKinley


The article Charles McKinley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Was in the news for a single insignificant event, so fails WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Commons:File:Francescadani gothic lolita butterfly.jpg
Hi. I don't know if you are aware, but your upload, Commons:File:Francescadani gothic lolita butterfly.jpg, has been tagged as needing Commons:COM:OTRS permission. There is a chance it will be deleted before long. Can you send the permission you received from the author to OTRS? Thanks. Wknight94 talk  17:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Reg your ref desk query
Use "T Vijayaraghavachariar" to search for more details. The "ar" suffix is a honorific indicating respect. In Tamil "acharya" becomes "acharyar" for older men. Gbooks search results point to some speeches he made about his canada visit.--Sodabottle (talk) 05:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Comics geronimo and his apache murderers.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comics geronimo and his apache murderers.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  howcheng  {chat} 19:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)   howcheng   {chat} 19:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Francescadani_gothic_lolita_butterfly.jpg
The file File:Francescadani_gothic_lolita_butterfly.jpg is nominated for deletion. Perhaps you would like to chip in over at Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Francescadani_gothic_lolita_butterfly.jpg. // Liftarn (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Book the art of monsters inc.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Book the art of monsters inc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Atariadventure.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Atariadventure.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 20:49, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Sabrina Online
I have nominated Sabrina Online, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sabrina Online&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Sabrina Online
Longevity ≠ notability if there're no secondary sources. I've been around 23 years and I'm not notable. DMFA has been around for 10 and it's not notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Errol Louis


The article Errol Louis has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wknight94 talk 02:07, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nader-sesame01.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nader-sesame01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

"Canada"'s Wonderland
Hi,

You need to provide an episode as a citation. And since that would be Season 2, it is currently out of episode sequence, eh.

They never did build the Canadian theme section they promised before they built it, did they?

Varlaam (talk) 22:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Laundry list
I was very surprised to find an experienced editor like you creating list of artists in the Art Gallery of Peel. Even if every artist in the list had an article here, I would still question whether the list is encyclopedic. I have e-mailed you your text, I suggest you seek agreement in talk:Art Gallery of Peel before re-creating hte article. &mdash; RHaworth 21:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikinewshas/Sesame Street
Template:Wikinewshas/Sesame Street has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 19:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yahoo! Kids


The article Yahoo! Kids has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not written in an encyclopedic manner. Unless it can be merged into Yahoo! with sources, it does not belong here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. T ofutwitch11 ''' (T ALK ) 21:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tv ads pizza hut muppets.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tv ads pizza hut muppets.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Crossley
As a contributor to this article (back in 2005!), you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Andrew Crossley. Robofish (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Re:Judaism in Rugrats
Thank you. :D Still, though, I actually wanna give that article a bit of time before an FAC (preferably get it a copyedit). I also plan on nominating "A Rugrats Passover" first. Again, though, thanks for the compliment. ;)  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 02:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of McDonald's trademarks for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article List of McDonald's trademarks, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of McDonald's trademarks until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Bkell (talk) 16:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

You were indirectly mentioned
in this discussion on Jimbo's talk page. Cardamon (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Michonne Bourriague for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Michonne Bourriague, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michonne Bourriague until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 17:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC).

Sesame Street stuff
Hi Zanimum,

I've seen that you've contributed some to a few Sesame Street articles. I must tell you, I am shocked--shocked! I mean, I'm usually the only person in the whole of Wikipedia working on them, so to see someone actually start to do something substantial with them...well, I don't know what to think about that! ;)

I'm surprised that you put up Sesame Street research up for GA. I mean, I'm very proud of that article, but I get a little nervous about submitting "my" articles for GA and FA. The whole process can be somewhat painful, especially an FAC. I appreciate that you think well of it to nominate it, though. Sometimes I need a kick in the behind to go the next step in the improvement process. I also noticed that you made some additions to International co-productions of Sesame Street, which is probably my favorite SS article I've written. (Do you think it has the potential to move on from GA to an FAC?) None of your additions are supported by an outside source. Did you know that you can use episodes, DVDs, and even YouTube clips as sources? You just have to cite it. Where did you get the information you added? One thing I'm trying to avoid is for editors to add content from their memory, the whole "I saw that on Sesame Street when I was three!" kind of thing. That OR, and not allowed here, ya know.

Anyway, thanks for your input. I've felt kind of lonely in working on these articles, although I can attest that it's been loads of fun. See ya around! Christine (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Christine! Nice to be back in the fray, after a bit of a disconnect from Wikipedia for a while. I presume you realize from talk pages, but I was originally in your position with the Sesame Street articles, an essentially lone contributor! It's amazing the revisions that you've made, not only whipping the core articles into shape, but creating various new ones from scratch. Thumbs up.


 * As for the GA nomination, I know how you feel. The nomination processes for anything these days, articles and users, is quite intense. Personal aside... whereas to become an admin nowadays, you face the firing line, back in 2003 or so, I was like "hey, I've got free time during my first period spare at high school, and there's a lot of uncontrolled vandalism then, d'ya want help?" Back to the nomination, I'm behind you all the way during the review process, here to help where I can with revisions. (The amount you're being subject to for History of Sesame Street... yeesh.) There's a few things in the modern era that I'd like to discuss with you, as possibly worth mention, though possibly not, before you send the history to FAC, but that's any other discussion for a bit later.


 * I'll take tonight to review the international co-production article, see where revisions could be made. It's a tricky topic, as coverage isn't always even handed. In the mean time, I've cited the changes, albeit to articles partially behind paywalls. The free summaries include the relevant info, though, so that's a relief. (There used to be a brilliant, academic article about Sesame Park when I was volunteering for DMOZ, c. 2000 or 2001, but it's long gone. If I remember correctly, archive.org hadn't bothered to scoop it up.) I privately have the complete Sesame Park episode guide, but its source isn't fully publicly accessible, so...


 * Anyway, more in a bit! --  Zanimum (talk) 22:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Z, that's so awesome that you're back. I've had so much fun working on these articles, and it'd be great to have someone along for the ride.  The fun, to be honest, is what overrides the drama.  There's no way I'd ever put myself through an RfA; I doubt that my nomination would be successful anyway, since I've been snarky and refused to suffer fools here.  It's not that I've made enemies--I haven't.  It's just that I'm sure that there's enough in my edit summaries that would cause me trouble.  Not that it matters, anyway.  I play in my own little corner in this big pond and make contributions when and how I can and have fun doing it.  Which is the point, right?


 * Currently, the history article is being copyedited, or at least someone told me he was planning on it. I agree, the process getting it to GA was ridiculous.  First, it was too American--hello, it's an American show, right?  Then the images, which are always a headache for me.  I will tell you right now that if its current images get in the way of a successful FAC, I'll withdraw it, and settle for the GA.  The alternative is no images, and I'd rather that it be accessed at a lower level than lose them.  There seems to be an attitude by some reviewers of these articles that it's not important enough.  It makes me wonder if reviewers are harder on them as a result, but that could just be me, being paranoid again. ;) I'd love to hear more about the modern era of The Show, since most of the materials I have (including Davis) focus on early history.


 * I saw your revisions to the co-productions article. I don't tend to use paywalled sources, to coin a phrase, but then again, I do use books.  If they're the only sources, they'll have to do.  Like I said, I'm very proud of this little article.  Personally, I think it's very even-handed and has lots of good sources, like the documentary.  (You can't beat J.G. Cooney saying, "We're like missionaries" with a straight face.  Can I please meet her?)  Remember, sources don't always *have* to be publicly accessible; they just have to be reliable and third-party.  So it's appropriate to use your Sesame Park collection.


 * Let's keep the discussion over here. The alternative is to start a Muppet Wikiproject.  There's already been some discussion about it.  I think that there's enough of us interested, so I may just go ahead and do it. Christine (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * FYI, call me Nick. I've never changed my username signature, but I'm also open with my identity.
 * Good philosophies towards editing. It's a jungle here occasionally, nice to find a couple of good treehouses to stay away from the monkeys.
 * Images are a pain, with culture articles. It's a Catch-22, ridiculous. If need be, we can work the cast and crew. Amongst the humans, Gordon/Bob/Alan/Maria/Leela are all fairly openly approachable, and various puppeteers for the show have semi-public presences. Beyond that, I write an occasional “Children's TV (Canada)” column for Examiner.com, so I can possibly sweet talk them into releasing some less valuable file photos. I doubt it, but maybe. If you can suggest specific images, I can try and track.
 * I think many reviewers are used to TV articles as being a scourge on the project. Every Pokemon having an article was one of the early battles. That sort of stuff rippled out to every other end of the TV realm on WP.
 * I agree, Joan's amazing. Do you know about her 9 part interview? It's quite broad sweeping, not sure if I ever have watched past a few parts in, as I was trying to use that for her bio on WP.
 * Yeah, the paywall's a bummer, but I've honestly never seen more than trivial mention of the show in books. There's one directory of Canadian television shows, published about 2002, but I don't really remember it discussed in there. (Was the bit about Basil being a full-body character from Cole or Gikow, or elsewhere?)
 * I'm surprised that private files are okay, I always thought accessibility was part of it.
 * There was a Muppet Wikiproject ages and ages ago, or perhaps it was just a portal... portals were such a blip on the radar of Wikipedia, essentially a front page, but theme specific. --  Zanimum (talk) 01:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The Cooney interview looks great; I'll have to check it out sometime. All Muppet articles could use some good free images, I think.  The Basil info was from Gikow.  She probably has the best content about the co-productions out there, other than the documentary. Christine (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lesley van der Lek


The article Lesley van der Lek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, lacks notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cenarium (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Please confirm your membership
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 20:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

File source problem with File:Fingerpuppets.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Fingerpuppets.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 05:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Independent Greens of Virginia
You have a previous edit on this article or Talk, so FYI: Talk:Independent Greens of Virginia. Let's try to make the article better. -Colfer2 (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Barkley (Muppet character) for deletion
The article Barkley (Muppet character) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barkley (Muppet character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  04:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Sesame Street characters
Hi Z, just saw what you did to the characters list. At first, I was like, "Wha..", but after getting over the shock, I like it. I have a few suggestions, though. How about we divide this list into three: "Human characters of Sesame Street", "Animated characters of Sesame Street", and "Sesame Street Muppets". I'd like to see the table of all three be designed the same; I like the original, with images to the right, since that tends to be the traditional design of lists in WP. I'll move behind you and fix all the refs, which were messed up in the moves. I think the leads you wrote are a good start, but I'd like to expand/improve them at some point. Also, could you give some kind of warning before you do something like this again? You almost gave this old lady a heart attack! ;) Christine (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi again, Z. Noticed your changes to the Humans list this morning, and to the SS template. Good work, but I have a few thoughts I'd like to share with you. Re: the list you added to the end of the Humans list: Please see the sections "Possible criteria for inclusion" and "Sources" on Talk:List of characters in Sesame Street, where a sort of policy for character inclusion in that list has emerged. I think that since the items in the list you added has no sources, and because the characters aren't "notable," they don't belong. I also think that these policies should be standardized to all SS lists. My inclination is to delete your list, sorry.

I liked the changes you made to the template. While working on improving the Humans list, I reconsidered my position about further splitting List of characters in Sesame Street and creating "List of animated characters on Sesame Street." I think that list would be long enough, and it would help making the main list smaller. I was going to do that next, but I've gotten distracted by the (failed) History of Sesame Street FAC, which I have two weeks to work on before resubmitting. I could see the Humans list, with further improvements, become a featured list, I really could. Of course, I'm sure we'd get dinked (haha, pun intended) for the images, but I have an email to SW requesting permission to use their images here. (I'm not holding my breath, doncha know.) Whatcha think? Christine (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Movies cruella.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Movies cruella.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

File:UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People 2004 meeting.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People 2004 meeting.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 16:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Pokemon/Pichu listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Pichu. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Pichu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Plácido Flamingo for deletion
The article Plácido Flamingo is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Plácido Flamingo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  01:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Movie poster agent cody banks.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Movie poster agent cody banks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fred Meijer


The article Fred Meijer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Fred Meijer for deletion
The article Fred Meijer is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fred Meijer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j &#9883; e deckertalk to me 18:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Rosemary Kilbourn
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Rosemary Kilbourn. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

GAN for Sesame Street research
Hi,

I have reviewed Sesame Street research and placed the nomination on hold for seven days to allow you to address a few issues I raised. My comments can be found transcluded onto the talk page. Good luck.-- K orr u ski Talk 14:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barbara Howard (artist)
The article Barbara Howard (artist) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Barbara Howard (artist) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Galliano's Spring-Summer 2004 Haute Couture collection


The article John Galliano's Spring-Summer 2004 Haute Couture collection has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG. Galliano is notable, but a single season's collection is not.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mjroots (talk) 17:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Sesame Street animators


The article List of Sesame Street animators has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and unnecessary list; information that is sourced is in other Sesame Street articles and lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christine (talk) 20:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Spring 2004 Dior couture collection for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spring 2004 Dior couture collection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Spring 2004 Dior couture collection until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 02:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Interactive Urinal Communicator


A tag has been placed on Interactive Urinal Communicator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 17:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The Price Is Right pricing games for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Price Is Right pricing games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of The Price Is Right pricing games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Sottolacqua  (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Wedding dress of Kate Middleton

 * I've left a note in my own !vote about yours. All the best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

hammerspace cartoon
It seems weird to me to include one of those admittedly clever Wikipedia cartoons in the article that the cartoon was made to illustrate - it's sort of like using the article as source material for itself. Don't you think? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 14:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * In a way, yes, but in absence of any other free image illustrating the concept... what if I were to see of Greg had higher-res, and I Photoshop it so that it's just the monkey, and monkey with hammer? --  Zanimum (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * In my ever-so-humble (ha!) opinion, I don't think an illustrative picture is needed in this case, unless it could be a picture of its use "in the wild" in a real-world cartoon - but that runs into the free-image issue. I think the description is quite clear. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia
Hi. :) I see that yesterday you added content to Wedding dress of Kate Middleton that you copied from another article, here. I just wanted to bring you up to date on how these are handled. In order to meet attribution requirements, we have to at least provide a wikilink to the article from which we're copying. "Main article" isn't really sufficient, I'm afraid, as we guarantee our contributors at minimum attribution through a hyperlink or URL. I know it took me a few minutes to figure out which article you meant (not following this story). In this case, I really needed to know, as the content is a violation of our copyright policy, with material taken directly from the BBC article sourced. :/ In terms of in-Wiki copying, Copying within Wikipedia includes more information, particularly on what to do when content copied is more extensive than that. I'll take care of providing full attribution here, but wanted to be sure you knew for future reference. :) If you know that you've copied content into any other articles, please make sure that it's fully attributed so we can comply with our contributors' license. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK nom for Lady Diana Spencer's dress
Thanks for you inputs to Wedding dress of Lady Diana Spencer, I already nominated it for DYK, so feel free to add your name credit to it on the DYK proposals page.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * How so, what do you mean? Nice work on the Princess Elizabeth dress article too. --  Zanimum (talk) 15:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Rathika Sitsabaiesan
Most of the clubs she was the head of have to be word for word, so I guess thats why it looks like it was lifted of the page. Intoronto1125 Talk  Contributions  13:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * And for the last edit, I did not undo your edit it just says that. I did make changes, please let me know if it still looks like it was lifted of the website. Intoronto1125 Talk  Contributions   13:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * If indeed it was a rewrite, I'll let you revert it back in. --  Zanimum (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Intellivision_on_demand.PNG)
Thanks for uploading File:Intellivision_on_demand.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

List of human characters in Sesame Street
Hey Z, I see that you made some additions to this list. I've already changed some things, but I wanted to talk to you before making other changes. Thanks for your contributions. The list is currently an FLC, but to be honest, other than maintaining it, I've lost my interest in the entire process. It has languished at FLC for a very long time, but I don't care.

At any rate, I thought that I'd just list my feedback here, if you don't mind:


 * References: there are a few reference issues with what you added. Please make sure that when you add a new reference, that you follow the existing format.  That's why I changed ref 16, and I would've changed more if I didn't have the issues below.  I'm a stickler regarding sources, so forgive the pickiness.


 * Ref 43: As far as I'm concerned, this newspaper article is unnecessary. It gives Arkin's name, but not his role on The Show.  Remember, we should only add information we can find a source for, and not information from wikis or from our memories.


 * Ref 44: It looks like this source is about Arkin, but not about Dana. The URL brings us to the book listing on Google; make sure that if you use an URL, we have access to the content.  If you have access to the particular book, go ahead and use it, as long as it's complete, with page numbers and such.  You don't have to provide the URL to the book listing.  If you don't have the full source information, you shouldn't include it.  My inclination is to remove ref 43 and 44, along with the information you claim they support.


 * Ref 77: Personal websites are not reliable sources. (See WP:SPS.)  Martin's website doesn't state that she reprised her SCTV role on Sesame Street.  When I googled her, I found some video clips, which are permissible.  I recommend that we use one on those, and then remove the SCTV stuff, unless we find a more reliable source for it.


 * Kermit Love: The sources you provide doesn't support the information you added about him.


 * Captions: You did some strange things. Did you mean to separate "plaid" into "pla id" in Roscoe Orman's caption?  You also changed things like "woman in her 60s" into "woman in her 1960s".  That's inaccurate. Christine (talk) 12:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK nom of Bramalea Satellites
Hello! Your submission of Bramalea Satellites at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 2aa7535317d93e81f8cc0193bdc05aeb
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token d042cdfd040c32b8c3ca03fe39bf5bcd
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thanks!
For the quick DYK review!  Hello Zanimum, User:DragonZero has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! DragonZero ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 17:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * My pleasure. FYI, keep an eye on Template:Did you know/Queue, where the hook will be transferred to eventually by the DYK overseers. "Local update times" will tell you when to expect it appearing. --  Zanimum (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Bramalea Satellites
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Images at Olek
Sorry, but I had to nominate two of the images at Olek for deletion: .--GrapedApe (talk) 03:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Olek
NW ( Talk ) 00:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

GA Olek
I have placed the review on hold so that you can address some concerns. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 12:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Please let's wrap this up. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I should get some time to do the revisions tonight, I've just been sidetracked with work and another project. Apologies... --  Zanimum (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Just checking in. We are almost done. Racepacket (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What is our status. Did you read my last comment? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 05:11, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the extended delay, I've made the suggested changes, and added a bit more about her early career. --  Zanimum (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Liza147.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Liza147.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)