User talk:Zanimum/Archive 20/Archive 19/Archive 14

GA Olek
I have placed the review on hold so that you can address some concerns. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 12:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Please let's wrap this up. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I should get some time to do the revisions tonight, I've just been sidetracked with work and another project. Apologies... --  Zanimum (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Just checking in. We are almost done. Racepacket (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What is our status. Did you read my last comment? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 05:11, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the extended delay, I've made the suggested changes, and added a bit more about her early career. --  Zanimum (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 012cebd6807a7a184018d61ef620ca94
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

possible vandal on sowiki
Please take note of this IP user. After blanking page twice, now he created an article and two talk pages. I can't read the language so please take a look. Thank you.--Ben.MQ (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Ben.MQ, I've posted this request to Administrators%27_noticeboard, so that someone can help. I don't have any sysop/administrator powers on so.wiki, nor can I read the language, so I'm afraid I'm not much help, either. --  Zanimum (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. Oh sorry. I followed the link on a local admin page and came here. Maybe that was a typo. Sorry for disturbing you. Regards.--Ben.MQ (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries! --  Zanimum (talk) 20:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Brampton Walk of Fame
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Duke of Cambridge's Personal Canadian Flag
Hello! Your submission of Duke of Cambridge's Personal Canadian Flag at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for realizing that, that was a gaffe to be sure. An edit has been made. --  Zanimum (talk) 19:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011 royal tour of Canada for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 royal tour of Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2011 royal tour of Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
—Bruce1eetalk 08:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Duke of Cambridge's Personal Canadian Flag
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Canadian flags
I really need to pay more attention to the details, I was confusing Charles with Henry. 117Avenue (talk) 22:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. Technically, Charles' flag hasn't actually been used yet, so in that sense its third. --  Zanimum (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for 2011 royal tour of Canada
NW ( Talk ) 00:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Thank you
You're welcome. Congratulations Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

GA nom for Murder of Julia Martha Thomas?
Thanks for your kind words about Murder of Julia Martha Thomas. It would be nice to take it up to GA but I have to admit that I'm a bit sceptical about the usefulness of GA nominations. Looking at the GA candidates page, I see nominations there that have gone untouched since April. It seems to be hit and miss whether anyone would actually do a GA review of it. Prioryman (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * So are you considering submitting directly to FA? Albeit not reading it fully, I'd say you'd probably be safe skipping GA, which is really just a formality in cases like yours. But yes, people eventually do review everything. But I'd say a direct jump to FA is okay. --  Zanimum (talk) 16:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's pretty much what I was thinking of, yes. I'll wait until the article appears on DYK before taking it to FA. I'll leave you a message when I've submitted it - I'd welcome any comments you might have. Prioryman (talk) 22:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool! --  Zanimum (talk) 23:13, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * As promised: Featured article candidates/Murder of Julia Martha Thomas/archive1. If you have any comments please feel free to contribute! Prioryman (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Your Edit to Upper Arlington, Ohio
Though you may feel otherwise, I do not believe that adding a picture of a girl "planking" in Fancyburg Park to the Upper Arlington, Ohio page is a relevant addition. Further, it detracts from the page's necessary information. Is planking even a major activity that is cited as unique to Upper Arlington's parks? Please reconsider your entire edit to the page, if only to correct your mistaken spelling. Thanks! --76.181.72.77 (talk) 06:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brampton Walk of Fame
The article Brampton Walk of Fame you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Brampton Walk of Fame for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. – Quadell (talk) 14:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Tv edwin maher.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tv edwin maher.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 17:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

File:TV sarah polley.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TV sarah polley.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 12:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tv 22 minutes parrish.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tv 22 minutes parrish.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nom for Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic
Hi Zanimum, I have reviewed your DYK nomination of Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic at Template talk:Did you know/Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic and there are a couple issues that need to be addressed. Could you see my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebecca F and the Memes.jpg
Fixed. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nom for History of Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto (1967-1971)
Hi Zanimun, I have reviewed your nomination of History of Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto (1967-1971) at Template talk:Did you know/History of Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto (1967-1971) and have something I would like to ask you. Could you please see my comments at the nominations page and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Refdeskquestion
The thingum on the corner of a castle that you were asking about is a bartizan.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for History of Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto (1967-1971)
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review Request
I have left my comments on the peer review page and noted there that everything looks good and the only thing that should be added is what has changed in the area since it first opened. Also, this article looks like it could get GA status (Good-article status) so i will be nominating it for GA status.--Dom497 (talk) 16:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I have nominated the article as a GA nomination.--Dom497 (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Canada's Wonderland Medieval Faire
Just wanted to let you know that if you are creating an article about the Medieval Faire at the park, and there already one about International Street, i think every section of the park (White water canyon, Action Zone, International Festival etc) should have their own article on Wikipedia... what ya think???--Dom497 (talk) 12:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Dom, yeah, I presume to at least write about Festival and Expo (1981-2008), the remaining original sections. Personally not being big on coasters, I'll certainly contribute to an Action Zone article, but I don't think I know enough to lead development on it. Perhaps White Water Canyon be merged with Splashworks some how? I don't know how many sources are available for either. But, in short, yes, every section deserves its own article. It'll certainly help spread the copious amounts of information out, so that the main article can be more tightly focused on the big picture. --  Zanimum (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WishComeTrue logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:WishComeTrue logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikinewspar3
Template:Wikinewspar3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

WindSeeker Peer-Review?
I know that you have't volunteered to help peer-review articles, but because none of the volunteers have a clue about amusement parks / rides, I thought you might be willing to do it. This review will help improve the article before I nominate it for featured article status. If you are willing to do it, please let me now ASAP. Thanks!!!--Dom497 (talk) 22:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Honestly, my knowledge of Wonderland is mainly limited to the early years. The only rides I've ridden there are Ghoster Coaster, Haunted Mansion, and the Antique Carousel. I'd love to help, but I don't know how much insight I can bring, coaster fan-wise. It's best to get an outsider's review of the article, to get an honest opinion of the prose. Even if they can't tell a Zamperla flying coaster from a B&M hyper, what matters most is the writing, sourcing, etc.


 * The image of the dampers at Knott's and sign at Knott's should be cropped, to eliminate the watermarking. The image is free licensed, so we're allowed to modify it. I can guarantee that, with watermarking, it won't pass FA. I'm also wondering about the amount of text on this image. It seems a little too much, particularly with regards to swing poles. --  Zanimum (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Royals
Yeah... The FT article also mentions rising popularity even in Austria, well worth the 60 secs it take to sign up for trial access if you havnt already. Btw, thanks for your improvement to the tour article. I also read your analyses about the events significance in the AfD, and think you were spot on. FeydHuxtable (talk) 11:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for International Street (Canada's Wonderland)
Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

National Cartoonists Society
I haven't changed, but note that the relocated paragraphs suggest the Billy DeBeck Award was by a "secret ballot", which was not the case. Pepso2 (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, thanks for noticing that! I'm not terribly familiar with either award, so it's good you saw that. Would you be able to make the change, given the fact you're more familiar? --  Zanimum (talk) 00:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: International Street (Canada's Wonderland) peer review
Hi, the peer review has already been closed and further comments should not be made there. Regardless, I took a look at your replies there. For the map (File:International Street map.png), you need to provide the sources for the geographical outlay and such (on the image page) for others to verify that the places are as such indicated. Also take care not to slavishly reproduce copyrighted maps.

The key problem for this article is the lack of reliable secondary sources. While primary sources can be used, they should be sparingly so and they can only be used for uncontroversial facts. If an article relies heavily on primary sources, it can be a source of concern. All this rules about sourcing can be found under Identifying reliable sources.

Items that rely on primary sources may not be important aspects of the subject. Wikipedia is not here to share the nitty, gritty details of the subjects; it is to present a comprehensive encyclopaedic overview (short enough to be interesting, long enough to satisfy any additional cravings, but not overly large to leave one gasping for breath). Because of a lack of coverage by reliable sources, some subjects may never have comprehensive articles on Wikipedia. Heavy use of primary sources is a possible indication of this. In editing this article, you have to consider that. Jappalang (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Save page
Template:Save page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Great South Africans (television series)


The article Great South Africans (television series) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, possibly copyvio. cf. Articles for deletion/200 Greatest Israelis. List articles that simply reproduce lists published elsewhere are non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review started
Hi. I've started a GA review on an article you nominated, at Talk:History of Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto (1967–1971)/GA1. --Noleander (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:TV sesame street hoopers store karaoke night.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TV sesame street hoopers store karaoke night.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε  05:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Morphsuits
The DYK project (nominate) 12:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:TV alan at hoopers store.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TV alan at hoopers store.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe   ε  01:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:TV the muppet show miss piggy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TV the muppet show miss piggy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe   ε  08:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Muppets
Portal:Muppets, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Muppets and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Muppets during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  21:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of International Street (Canada's Wonderland)
The article International Street (Canada's Wonderland) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:International Street (Canada's Wonderland) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. InThe AM 17:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Parks/Task Forces/Cedar Fair
Earlier this year you began a task force for Cedar Fair articles which came under the banner of the Amusement Parks WikiProject. I have only just noticed this and I have completed the edits regarding the categories required. If you would like to create the task force page at WikiProject Amusement Parks/Task Forces/Cedar Fair it would be greatly appreciated. You can use the other task forces as a guide. Themeparkgc  Talk  23:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Main page images
Hello! Please remember to locally upload and protect images before placing them on the main page. Following this edit, File:Zoran jankovic.jpg remained unprotected (and subject to vandalism) until approximately 39 minutes later, when KrinkleBot (which recently suffered a major outage) cascade-protected it at Commons. Thank you! —David Levy 22:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, I wasn't aware that it had an outage. I was used to images always being auto-protected. Sorry. --  Zanimum (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note that even when the bot is fully operational, it doesn't protect images immediately. (In this instance, approximately 39 minutes elapsed.)  It was set up as a fallback, not as a first-line protection method.
 * Thanks again! —David Levy 04:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

File:John Haggert.gif needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:John Haggert.gif appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brampton Walk of Fame
The article Brampton Walk of Fame you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Brampton Walk of Fame for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Devil&#39;s Advocate (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street


A tag has been placed on Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Algamicagrat (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street


A tag has been placed on Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Algamicagrat (talk) 23:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Friday
Replied. Bruvtakesover (T&#124;C) 23:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

"merciless wrath!"
Last warning to you, Zanimum! Any more talkback, and you will suffer at my merciless wrath! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.154.127 (talk) 22:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebecca Black Friday at 42 second mark.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rebecca Black Friday at 42 second mark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Toronto Blue Jays mascots
Hello! Your submission of Toronto Blue Jays mascots at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 23:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Toronto Blue Jays mascots
The DYK project (nominate) 08:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Murder of Julia Martha Thomas
A while back you kindly supported the featured article candidacy of Murder of Julia Martha Thomas. I thought you might like to know that the article is being considered for the Main Page on 2 March, the anniversary of the event. If you have any comments on this proposal, please feel free to comment at Today's featured article/requests. Prioryman (talk) 20:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Zanimum,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC) Young June Sah --Yjune.sah (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released
Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox -.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Puppy BASICS


The article Puppy BASICS has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 03:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Incidents during Caribana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Incidents during Caribana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Incidents during Caribana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kwakiutl (statue)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 18:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Erin Mills Town Centre
I think we have a flash mob at the mall! Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It does seem to be. Wonder if it's a corporate exercise? Kunal Rathore has a Linkedin, but isn't related to the mall at all. Lena isn't a real person, or if they are, they're not too internet savvy. Smashenhurst is the Twitter handle of a university student. There doesn't seem to be any real rhyme or reason. I'm tempted to semi, but I'm tempted to see how many more will join in. Weird. --  Zanimum (talk) 20:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Scamander24 is not part of the current crop. Those edits were last year. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Whoops. --  Zanimum (talk) 23:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Moose in the City, List of Moose in the City at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Compilation album for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Compilation album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Compilation album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Moose in the City
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

GAN Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic
Hi,

I've started a reveiw of your GAN at Talk:Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic/GA1 and listed some suggestions. I think it's a very interesting article. Is there more information that could be added? MathewTownsend (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have responded on the review page: Talk:Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic/GA1 MathewTownsend (talk) 16:00, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your GAN has passed. Congratulations! Very nice. Best wishs, MathewTownsend (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * My goodness, thanks! Between the Easter weekend and work, I had forgot to return to this article, and respond to the questions you had left. I thank you for all your review, and for the significant reorganization of the article, it's much appreciated! --  Zanimum (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Patrick Brazeau
Actually it was already only on semi-protection, not on full administrator-only protection. Indef is a separate issue, which is about the length of time rather than the user level — and while I'll happily unprotect the article, anybody with protection/unprotection ability is allowed to make that judgement call at any time. So aside from the fact that the protection queue appears to be a bit backlogged, it didn't strictly have to wait for me to come back and unprotect it myself — but that's neither here nor there. I'll unprotect it now, but since you're probably monitoring the page more closely than I am right now, let me know if any issues crop up again. Bearcat (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Bearcat, thanks for the unprotect. Mercifully, all seems calm on the page so far. --  Zanimum (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Olek
Hi, Zanimum, I've completed the copy-edit you requested on the above article. It isn't perfect but as it's a GA I did some restructuring and a general clean-up.. I'm sorry you had to wait so long for the c/e. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow, thank you so much for your edits, that's fantastic! I do like the reordering you've done. --  Zanimum (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Tut tut!
An admin of your caliber forgetting to add reflists to an article? Burn him at the stake! It might be the first time as although I ran the bot in 2009-2010, that was on my personal computer so I only ran it when I was around. Now this runs on Wikimedia Labs (it's like the toolserver), so it will run every 15 minutes, it's more likely to interact with you and your mistakes (!). The Helpful  One  22:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I was copy and pasting from another article, I swear! Interesting re: the bot's operation. I'm also wondering if it's just because my watchlist had tens of thousands of pages on it, so I literally hadn't looked at it from roughly 2003 to a few months ago. Aloha! --  Zanimum (talk) 22:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * So I found this clever little tool, [//toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/editorinteract.cgi?user1=Thehelpfulbot&user2=Zanimum&ns=none], seems like you've been caught a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brampton_City_Hall&diff=429130889&oldid=429116226 couple] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maple_Leaf_Village&diff=427430304&oldid=427334748 more] times! The  Helpful  One  17:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK - Medieval Faire (Canada's Wonderland)
I hate being the bearer of bad news, but I've just reviewed your DYK nomination for Medieval Faire (Canada's Wonderland), but it doesn't meet the criteria, as it hasn't been expanded enough, recently enough (it needs to be made five times bigger (i.e. 10kb -> 50kb) in the 5 days before nomination). It may be possible to create a new article from the added material, provided the new stuff is notable enough to merit that in it's own right. I'm not sure what else to say, other than I learned the hard way myself! If you want a second opinion, I'll happily change the voting symbol from a to a  on the DYK template. Wikiwayman (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry - my mistake - I didn't see the move from your name space!!!! Wikiwayman (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries! --  Zanimum (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Now reviewed (properly this time). Maybe you could go for the following (easy to prove) hook? ... that Leviathian, opening today at Medieval Faire (pictured) will be the biggest ride at Canada's Wonderland? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwayman (talk • contribs) 17:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geoffrey James


The article Geoffrey James has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 21:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've provided more than one. --  Zanimum (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ron Gray for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Gray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ron Gray (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 22:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ed Vanwoudenberg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Vanwoudenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ed Vanwoudenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 22:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Medieval Faire (Canada's Wonderland)
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Renfrew Mercury
Hello! Your submission of Renfrew Mercury at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * It has been over a week since I posted the above, and there has been no response on the nomination page, nor have there been edits to the article. Please reply within 24 hours of when you see this, or I will have to assume that you are not interested in addressing the issues with your nomination. It would be a shame if you decided to let this lapse. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm so sorry that I didn't reply earlier. Between work and my grandma recouping in the hospital (which is a far drive away), I haven't had much computer time recently. I tried posting a similar message Tuesday, but the internet cacked out on me. When you first reviewed, I noticed a day or so later, but I was just overwhelmed by the review. I've had briefer GA reviews, so it was a bit overwhelming. I appreciate it, truly, it's helpful in the long term, but it was just a bit of a wallop. --  Zanimum (talk) 01:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry to hear about your grandmother; I hope she is much improved. I certainly didn't mean to wallop you: the article was a nice start, but it had an "under construction" feel to it with some significant disconnects and crucial omissions.


 * Do you plan on doing more work on the article soon? I can hold the review open a while longer if you plan to address those issues, but not if you won't be making progress in the next week or so. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Renfrew Mercury
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Suicide Six for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suicide Six is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suicide Six until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Suicide Six


A tag has been placed on Suicide Six, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Sesame Street
Is there any reason in particular why Sesame Street, New York, New York isn't titled Sesame Street, New York City like the others? Thanks. Marcus  Qwertyus   03:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Interesting idea, Marcus. No, there's no particular reason, feel free to change to the standard. --  Zanimum (talk) 14:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Peter Robertson (politician)/sandbox
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Peter Robertson (politician)/sandbox. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi!  That's also an unusual spot for that, and the article should probably be moved.  If you are still working on the article and don't believe that it's ready for article space, move it to User Zanimum/Peter Robertson (politican)   -- or if you want, i can do that for you.  If you're ready for it to be an article, it should be moved to simply "Peter Robertson (politician)".  Just let me know which you intend and I'll be happy to help.  Cheers!  --j⚛e deckertalk 02:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Moved to User:Zanimum/Peter Robertson (politician). Cheers, --j⚛e deckertalk 00:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Web subservient chicken michael jackson moves.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Web subservient chicken michael jackson moves.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Robertson (politician)/sandbox
A tag has been placed on Peter Robertson (politician)/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PROMO! Awards


The article PROMO! Awards has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable award.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

RE : Algo Centre Mall Collapse
I just thought I'd thank you for your help expanding and cleaning up the Algo Centre Mall article, much appreciated. I've nominated it for ITN, and added you as one of the credits for the article expansion. There's just one weak oppose vote so far, not sure whether article contributors can vote. I'm also planning to put it in DYK, I'm asking on the article talk page for ideas on a "hook". -- Zanimum (talk) 00:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * On a side note, good to see you're back at Wikipedia. I thought you might be newer, but I now see you've been her since 2008. Wow! --  Zanimum (talk) 00:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I will continue to update the article as time goes by. Also, thank you for welcoming me back to Wikipedia. It's kinda tricky, as I never really left, just didn't have time to edit that much. (I just mostly read articles) But now that I have graduated, I have more time to make actual contributions. Oh and if you're curious, I was here since '06, under a different account. (I would have been 12 at that point) Acebulf (talk) 01:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, just seeing that now, that you were around. (Thought I'd link to that chart, just in case you weren't aware of it.) Cool, that's always great when people contribute at that age. I in 2002, at 15 or 16 (?), and the reason I'm a sysop is that I had a first period spare in grade 10 (?). I would sit on recent changes in the library, when there were literally maybe only a few other sysops on Wikipedia, and revert vandalism. It was basically "hi, I'm new, I'd like to be an admin", and "okay, sure" a dozen times on the nomination board. --  Zanimum (talk) 01:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

GAN Talkback
Talk:Algo Centre Mall/GA1. Thanks! ⇒ T A  P  11:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Looking through some of your articles I'm concerned about you misuse of paragraphs. A lot of your paragraphs are way too short and its unnecessary for them to be separate and should be merged. You're doing great work, but just try to avoid short paragraphs as it disrupts article flow and quality of reading.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/The Show Where Sam Shows Up
Ping, just in case you forget. --George Ho (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Shall I move this to WP:april Fool's Main Page/Did You Know then? You verified that this is well-researched and written, right? By the way, I think using templates to transclude images would clarify things, as I don't see question marks or ticks. --George Ho (talk) 04:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Algo Centre Mall
I've confirmed only one of four hooks for the Algo Centre Mall dyk nomination, the other three had various issues, some of which probably need to be corrected regardless of their effect on DYK. Just wanted to give you a heads up. Tomsimlee (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Stephanie Beard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Beard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stephanie Beard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Medieval Faire GA review
I've completed the initial review now. There are some sections that need a bit of revision and I've noted all that down on the review. Generally it's in pretty good shape so it's on hold while you have a look at my comments. Bladeboy1889 (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I'll see what I can do tonight, but I'll definitely have reply/edits to the article by Tuesday evening. --  Zanimum (talk) 17:48, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Algo Centre Mall
Hi. Can you comment on Template:Did you know nominations/Algo Centre Mall so we can move the review along? :) Thanks. --LauraHale (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kelsey Titmarsh
Hello! Your submission of Kelsey Titmarsh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! IronGargoyle (talk) 22:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Elliot Moose
Just curious, do you have any idea why you ever moved Elliot Moose to Elliot Moose (TV series)? There isn't anything else by that name, so the (TV series) part isn't needed. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * At some point, there needs to be an article about the book series that the television program was based on. --  Zanimum (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kelsey Titmarsh
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Kipling-interior.jpg
You uploaded File:Kipling-interior.jpg to Commons and describe it as "Picture taken by Kareeser", without giving the source. A good article review is taking place here Talk:Kipling_(TTC)/GA1 for the subway station. Under these circumstances I would like to verify the licensing, since the image is being used in the Infobox and I think it is probably the best we currently have. Do you know the photographer or the source? Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Secondarywaltz, sorry for the delayed reply. I've poked into the "View and restore deleted pages" for that image...

Summary
Took picture myself. Picture of Kipling Subway Station with Eastbound train at left side of picture.

Licensing

 * I guess I chose the wrong option on the drop-down box on the Commons upload page... either that, or I believe the folks behind GFDL facilitated the transition of old GFDL images to Creative Commons, through ? Not sure.  --  Zanimum (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you mean that you transferred the file to Commons from Wikipedia and the original uploader is a user there? If that is true, then you do know the source and photographer, except it is not stated in the information and description. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Keys of the City in the United States


The article List of Keys of the City in the United States has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Most of the recipients are not notable. Sources are merely promotional or incidental local coverage. Doesn't seem like a notable topic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Keys of the City in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Keys of the City in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Keys of the City in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Sesame Street
I was wondering if I should put it up about JHC. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Berlin peer review
I recently put in a peer review for Berlin. Would you be able to contribute to the peer review? Kingjeff (talk) 03:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Summer Mortimer
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover of the book Pierrot the Clownfish.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of the book Pierrot the Clownfish.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Summer Mortimer
The article Summer Mortimer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Summer Mortimer for things which need to be addressed. LauraHale (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit request at Template talk:WikiProject Death
Hello! I saw that you have made at least one edit to the template, and I wonder if you would be willing to take a look at my edit request there? I also left this message for. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 16:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, but unfortunately it looks like there is a problem with my suggested code. The image is being replaced everywhere, not just at the pages where Suicide=Yes. --Tgeairn (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I placed corrected code at the edit request. Sorry about that, I thought I had tested it correctly. --Tgeairn (talk) 18:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * and put the correction in place and added their own as well. Thanks again for the help! --Tgeairn (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for McDonalds (New Hyde Park)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tv jeopardy may 25 2005 board.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tv jeopardy may 25 2005 board.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chloe Lang


The article Chloe Lang has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ENT. Too soon.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Chloe Lang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chloe Lang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chloe Lang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sum mer PhD (talk) 21:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)