User talk:Zanoni/Archive 26

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

"Currently"
Hi. Per MOS:RELTIME words such as "currently" should be avoided. I've removed the word at Dennis Greene (footballer). Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * thanks for the heads up Zanoni (talk) 11:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Kevin Berkoe
The information you added was a) unsourced b) incorrect. I have fixed. Please be more careful in future. GiantSnowman 20:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Please any updates:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:I-League_managers# 83.131.95.105 (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Kevin Fisher
Thanks - but we don't include the non-official matches. GiantSnowman 20:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries! GiantSnowman 22:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Fake information
Stop given fake information on player profiles please. ChazMclopez (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * You are now using a username ChazMclopez and you seem to think I am supposed to not believe you are the player or closely related to the player in question? Kindly provide *verifiable* (i.e. independently sourced) links. NFT and Transfermkt are not reliable sources - frankly anyone can get stuff added to those, and then those were used as the initial source for the wikipedia article.  I have now found evidence that this player has named on the bench (and may have played) for one match for Braintree Town in an August 2020 pre-season friendly and have added it.  This is the way wikipedia works - sources are needed - and sources have been provided for all of the entries - not my opinion. 11:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Where are you getting your so called evidence from a Wrexham fan page that is not a reliable source that is fan option. There is NFT and transfermarkt. This player is also not a Prestatyn Town F.C signing more incorrect information. Braintree town has been removed from the players Wikipedia and any other club that was not in the original information giving. ChazMclopez (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * ChazMclopez: - (1) The Wrexham stuff has been removed and not re-added (2) Transfermarkt are not considered acceptable sources by the Wikipedia community see List of acceptable football sources and also noted at the bottom of that page explicitly that this is not to be used for Wikipedia articles as it can be user-generated. (3) Braintree is added in the text of the current article as I can find evidence of a pre-season friendly in 2020.  The infobox does not cover pre-season friendlies - if there is evidence that the player played in a *competitive game* for the club please do provide with citation for evidence.  (4) The provided link says the Player signed for Prestatyn and it was also covered by Grassroots North Wales and Roscoe commented on the signing on twitter and also that the player failed to make the friendly match.  As you will see the article says he was announced as signed which is correct and sourced.  (5) The other clubs - Besa Kavaje, FC Besa, Järve, Port Vale and Ebbsfleet United, people have looked for acceptable sources and failed.  I've undertaken google advanced searches on the Port Vale website and Ebbsfleet United and there's nothing that comes up. Zanoni (talk) 12:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Charley McMillan-Lopez
Let me know if you need any more help. GiantSnowman 14:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Theo Roberts for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theo Roberts, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Theo Roberts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Cheshire Association Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Brighton F.C..

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Dougie Nyaupembe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dougie Nyaupembe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Dougie Nyaupembe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

False info
Why you consistently right false information on Charley McMillan-Lopez page ? 92.40.174.207 (talk) 10:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * You have been asked by numerous people to provide ACTUAL evidence that this player has played for those clubs. NFT is not evidence, neither is Transfermkt.  Grassroots North Wales simply reported claims of these clubs.  If you can provide any independent news evidence via match reports from the internet, twitter etc I will believe that this player has turned out for any of these clubs.  I have searched for evidence to include in the article and I can find NOTHING on playing competitive games for these clubs.  That's why I keep deleting the claims. Zanoni (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * (provide any independent news evidence via match reports from the internet, twitter etc I will believe that this player has turned out for any of these clubs. I have searched for evidence to include in the article and I can find NOTHING on playing competitive games for these clubs. ) twitter isn't independent news... and there is nothing on him playing competitive matches for Ashford United or East Thurrock United? There is no evidence that shows that Charley McMillan-Lopez has played a competitive game for those clubs you have put down. Also you can't say anything about Prestatyn if he didn't play for them or Braintree town fc. So if it has to be independent news from only the Internet there shouldn't be any clubs there but the BVI national team. That clearly shows that he has played 2 official games. 90.255.15.125 (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * No-one said Twitter was independent news, but clearly if (club x) included a link to a match report on their official Twitter account that a player had turned out for them in a competitive game, then this would act as evidence. A link is included for the player being on the bench for an FA Cup tie for Ashford, so that is good enough for me for evidence that he was in the squad for that match.  Also the fact that East Thurrock United's official website had a profile for him on their website shows he was with them for at least a while - although there's no evidence he played in a game for them from my look around the website.   In terms of Prestatyn Town the club clearly announced him as a new signing (see reference). The fact that he could not find his way to their ground to play the match was also reported by the manager (see reference)  The thing you seem to be missing is that there is no equivalent evidence for any time at any of the other clubs like Port Vale, Ebbsfleet and the Albanian, Kosovan and Estonian club websites or any press/ match reports to confirm time with these clubs.  Zanoni (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Also I did not put down Ashford or East Thurrock - they were already in the article, I just added sources to the claims around those clubs! Zanoni (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Charley McMillan-López dosent say anywhere he played official game for Ashford untied or East thurrock untied. News about Prestatyn the only thing I saw was the official signing of him also in your link. But he hasn't played for them too. This player hasn't played for those clubs you have put there. Should remove them because there is no proof he has turned out for any of those clubs. Based on what you said none of the clubs should be there because there is nothing showing he played for them 90.255.15.125 (talk) 11:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The article no longer has him listed as a Prestatyn Town player in the infobox clubs, just reports that the club announced he would be joining them and that he eventually did not. These are sourced and hence should stay.  Ashford's website show him as a substitute for an FA Cup game - an official match report shows his name and he also was featured in another pre-season friendly as a non-official match as 'Charlie Lopez' Match report so that should also stay.  I don't have strong views over keeping the East Thurrock one as no evidence of him playing for him beyond why would East Thurrock have a player profile if they did not at some point consider him a squad member for the club 14:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Updater
Sorry to revert your edit, but if a league has finished, please update the final positions at English football updater so all the league is done in one go (and in a consistent format). I've done the NWCL now. I was quite surprised how early they've finished the season. Cheers, Number   5  7  20:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I only did that club - I did note the updater but no idea how it works - so any advice would be welcome as would be keen to add to the Welsh leagues as I have manually done all of those last season! Sorry for messing that club up.  Not only has the season ended but the first divisions had play-off matches this weekend! - very early even with a Covid break at Christmas/ January Zanoni (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I would start a separate one for the Welsh leagues rather than adding them to the English one, which is massive.
 * In terms of how it works, there are three bits of info for each club. When I set it up, I gave an eight-letter identifier for each club, so for example, you could have the below (the | separates each of the three bits of info.




 * Then in the club article infobox, you add  in the league parameter,   in the season parameter and   in the position parameter, and it shows the matching information from the updater.
 * Hope that makes sense? Cheers, Number   5  7  21:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It does - thanks, and now I've looked at the template, I think i can work on that for a Wales one. Cheers for the advice!   08:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Zanoni (talk) 08:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Number - what am I doing wrong?  Look at the New Saints one - and see Template:Welsh football updater (have only linked TNS article to test) - thanks 10:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ignore that, was trying to be too clever. Fixed now. 10:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Released players
In the English system, contracts end on 30 June (so players leave clubs on that date) and begin on 1 July (so players join new clubs on that date). Please wait until those dates before editing. GiantSnowman 08:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Eritrea national football team
Hey!

Thanks for your edits on the Eritrea football page. Do you reckon we should move the content on refugees to its own section, as per the Cuba national football team page?

Keep up the great work,

Felixsv7 (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message - I had pondered editing a sub-section with a rewrite of the content, but had added to my internal list of things to do. Happy to do so in due course or equally more than happy if you wanted to! - all the best Zanoni (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * It was just that you were continuing to edit, I didn't want to step all over your work! But I'll take a look and split it - in due course :) Felixsv7 (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * No problems! - enjoy :-) Zanoni (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

British Virgin Islands national football team
Hi,

Do you have the source for the British Virgin Islands team? Could you please add it rather than removing the citation needed comment. Also, rather than writing "subs needed" as text, put it into a Data missing template if that is the case?

Cheers,

Felixsv7 (talk) 08:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Added and apologies if 'subs-needed' added as copied over from one of my sandboxes. Player's appearances and goals now updated included those who appeared as substitutes in last night's game. Zanoni (talk) 11:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucas Kirnon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Kirnon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lucas Kirnon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jalen Smeins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalen Smeins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jalen Smeins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Cleaveland Simon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cleaveland Simon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cleaveland Simon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Gilford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Gilford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Gilford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jake Forbes (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Forbes (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jake Forbes (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. HeinzMaster (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Salford City F.C.. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Clearly is a fine article but given the WPSPORTS stazi have decided now that footballers from non first world countries are now not notable when they play international games, yet a youth team player for a Premier League team is given they have some column inches, whatever Zanoni (talk) 11:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jordan Deans for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Deans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jordan Deans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Stewart Murray (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewart Murray (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stewart Murray (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lucas Kirnon
Hello, Zanoni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucas Kirnon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lucas Kirnon


Hello, Zanoni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucas Kirnon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mervyn Hazelwood for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mervyn Hazelwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mervyn Hazelwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 06:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liam Jacob


The article Liam Jacob has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexis Saddler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexis Saddler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alexis Saddler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Liam Jacob for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liam Jacob, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Liam Jacob until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abijah Rivers


The article Abijah Rivers has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails to meet GNG. I can find no significant coverage, just passing mentions in match reports etc"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raheem Robinson


The article Raheem Robinson has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Played a few games for the Cayman Islands national team but has generated no significant coverage. I can only find some brief mentions in match reports and other routine coverage searching online and in the Cayman Compass.

He also appears in some articles about basketball but I don't think it's enough.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Raheem Robinson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raheem Robinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raheem Robinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Abijah Rivers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abijah Rivers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abijah Rivers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Eugene Kirwan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugene Kirwan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eugene Kirwan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 05:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jason Ebanks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Ebanks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jason Ebanks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Martin Waud for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Waud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Martin Waud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 18:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Aldene Forbes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldene Forbes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aldene Forbes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 20:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tex Whitelocke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tex Whitelocke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tex Whitelocke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Matthew Suberan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Suberan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matthew Suberan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 02:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kemar Scott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kemar Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kemar Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Benjamin Cupid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Cupid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Benjamin Cupid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Javis Jones for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javis Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Javis Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cornelius Butcher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornelius Butcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cornelius Butcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Enderson George for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enderson George is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Enderson George until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uprising FC players


A tag has been placed on Category:Uprising FC players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Nicholas Ebanks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Ebanks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nicholas Ebanks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JTtheOG (talk) 20:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)