User talk:Zanzanar

Speedy deletion of Scribbles for Hire
A tag has been placed on Scribbles for Hire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shootthedevgru (talk) 09:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The article Scribbles for Hire has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. While I agree that it is not blatant advertising, the article seemed to be about web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
 * The article Scribbles for Hire has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. While I agree that it is not blatant advertising, the article seemed to be about web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.


 * Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for for web sites, for musicians. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Choc w sml.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Choc w sml.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Prince Zanzanar.JPG
Hi Zanzanar!

We thank you for uploading Image:Prince Zanzanar.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)