User talk:Zappa711

TIME Monday, July 29, 2024; (UTC)

Hi, Actually my edit to Aristarchus (crater) /sectors was not vandalism, but an accidental misuse of copy/paste might have made part of it appear so. I've re-done it to reflect my original intention. Thanks, Chris. 82.2.80.164 20:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Turkey
Please see discussion at Category talk:Diplomatic missions by country and comment, thanks! Kransky (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Should be done according to how each foreign affairs depart. classifies them. e.g. CHina. With respect to Turkey, it can be considered as an European country, a Middle eastern country, a Eurasian country, or an Asian country or all of them. so in this case it would depend on the how the diplomatic country classifies it -- on a country-by-country basis.


 * Maybe when or if Turkey gains full EU membership in 10, 20, 30 etc years time then -- for example -- China's foreign ministry will move diplomatic responsibility for Turkey to its Europe and Central Asia division or Europe division. Zap 14:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please add your comment to the discussion page. As for your idea, it would be pretty difficult to know what each foreign ministry thinks.  Kransky (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

My contribuition to the Raytheon page.
Is a verifiable fact. They are the worlds number one producer of guided missiles (which mainly end up killing civilians by the way). You could have easily checked it yourself with a simple search instead of reverting my changes just to be a little prick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fettzort (talk • contribs) 16:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not my job to check everything by searching for it. In that case why not delete every single reference on wikipedia and say look for it yourself. Zap 17:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Large companies in China
Hi! Some of the companies in red link were forwarded to respective company names. The remaining do not have English paragraphs currently. Ricky@36 23:15 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your help. Zap 15:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Please follow the rules
Wikipedia is not your personal website. If you want to create articles, please follow the rules. If you don't you will be blocked from editing. – ukexpat (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I've been creating many articles of the same nature that not deleted. Zap 19:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleting speedy deletion tags on articles you have created is not following the rules - the speedy notice on the article tells you how to contest it. If you had followed that simple rule so that an admin could review the articles and decide on whether to speedily delete or not, I would not have reported you. – ukexpat (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

24 hour block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Firstly, I am templating a regular because it gives you the option of appealing your block - providing you understand the reason for your block and you address the reason why it was applied then I would be happy for it to be lifted. ( note to reviewing admin - please end or vary tariff as you see fit ) Secondly, you have been around WP long enough to know you must not remove speedy delete notices from articles you have created or been the main contributor. You can use the template, or simply trust that the reviewing admin will recognise the value of the article. Your own actions mean that you are now unable to contest the notices, until the block expires or is lifted. I suggest that you undertake to follow process should the block be lifted when you make your appeal. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Zap 22:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Why should you be unblocked? Do you understand the reason for your block? Woody (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Minmetals Resources
A tag has been placed on Minmetals Resources requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 20:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Nepstar.jpg)
You've uploaded File:Nepstar.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Digital 3D
An article that you have been involved in editing, Digital 3D, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dr Mikomi (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kunming
Template:Kunming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of largest Chinese companies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of largest Chinese companies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of largest Chinese companies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Viztor (talk) 12:03, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

"2nd Five-Year Pla" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2nd_Five-Year_Pla&redirect=no 2nd Five-Year Pla] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. ときさき  くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 06:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

"Second Five-Year Pla" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Five-Year_Pla&redirect=no Second Five-Year Pla] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. ときさき  くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 06:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)