User talk:Zapytowskil1/Evaluate an Article

Response
Good work, Zapytowskil1! Now that you've published, I am able to see your evaluation. Overall, I think you're addressing some of the basic elements that make this article effective. I agree with your general points, but some specific examples of your observations. For instance, you note that the presence of many sources makes the article *seem* as though it's well sourced. But are those "good" sources, according to Wikipedia's standards? Are there ways to improve the sourcing? I'm also not sure what you mean when you say that the article addresses "both sides" because it describes people of different genders competing in the Boat Race. As you read about in prior trainings, Wikipedia doesn't try to address multiple sides; rather, the goal is to stay neutral on the topic. Finally, I think attention to all aspects of the article as the guidance suggests (Lead, Organization, Tone, Sources, Writing Quality, Talk Page Discussion) would help you to have a more comprehensive evaluation. But this is a good start! Pthomas4 (talk) 05:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)