User talk:Zarano

I hate to do this since it doesn't look like you come here anymore, and since Image:KoraDiagram.gif is a nice pic to have in the article... but, it needs info on source and license or it will be deleted. / Habj 20:03, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Golden Passionfruit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Golden Passionfruit.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Save the Tiger Fund


A tag has been placed on Save the Tiger Fund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. InvadingInvader (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Save the Tiger Fund


The article Save the Tiger Fund has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The only reference in this entire article is dead and unarchived (it leads to a 404); there has not been any significant expansions of this stub in a while. No additional verifiable sources have added in six years, and the article is very much written like an advertisement. A google search for news on the fund returns no helpful results. I see no reason for this being left as an article, and at most, the fund should be only mentioned in either ExxonMobil's article or the NFWF foundation's article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Save the Tiger Fund for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Save the Tiger Fund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Save the Tiger Fund until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. InvadingInvader (talk) 04:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)