User talk:Zargulon/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi Zargulon, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 18:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

HELP US MAKING THE PROJECT OF ANCIENT GREEK WIKIPEDIA
We are the promoters of the Wikipedia in Ancient Greek. we need your help, specially for write NEW ARTICLES and the TRANSLATION OF THE MEDIAWIKI INTERFACE FOR ANCIENT GREEK, for demonstrating, to the language subcommittee, the value of our project.

Thanks a lot for your help. Ἡ Οὐικιπαιδεία needs you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.40.197.5 (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Philosophy
No, the idea was that you should explain why you thought that your edits were desirable, not indulge in recriminations. If you explain (at Talk:Philosophy) what you think is wrong with the article, and why it needs to be changed, then people can discuss your ideas and suggestions. --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 09:45, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Ultimate music
Hi there. Thanks for updating the Sabre Wulf and Pentagram (video game) pages. I'd no idea what the music was called. Cheers. --Plumbago 19:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Protein structure prediction
I just wanted to make sure you are aware of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. --JWSchmidt 12:10, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Reform Judaism
Hi! I think you were right to redact my choice of "analogue" to describe Liberal Judaism. Poor choice of word. I also have a tendency to construct long sentences; it's just my writing style. Thanks for the feedback. I took another stab at the intro para for this article, as it is really choppy. More to follow. Best, Kaisershatner 13:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

See talk. Kaisershatner 17:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi Zargulon, you haven't commented on my edits on Reform Judaism yet. What do you think? Izehar 20:02, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

vote
Hi, there's a vote on at Talk:Mormon views about Mormonism and Judaism. People want to move the article that describes the Mormon views on Judaims to "Mormonism and Judaism". Just thought you should know. Izehar (talk) 00:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop-time
Fixed. Hyacinth 12:56, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

感謝と記事執筆のお願い
こんにちは/今晩は. Avigdor Dagan, Esther Wertheimerなどの翻訳ありがとうございます.

ja:Category:ユダヤ教関連のスタブ記事、ja:ユダヤ人の一覧、ja:シナゴーグにどっさり未翻訳記事・赤リンクがありますので、よろしければ翻訳してみてください. また、よろしければja:Wikipedia:ウィキプロジェクト ユダヤ教に参加しませんか? 日本語とヘブライ語がお分かりになる方は、このプロジェクトにぴったりだと思います.
 * --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 12:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * バーンスターを送っちゃいます.

執筆のお誘い
こんにちは/今晩は. お願いがあって参りました. 様々な記事を書かれておられるようですが、ja:Category:出身別の人名一覧を辿りますと、～人の一覧、ja:ポーランド人の一覧、ja:ユダヤ人の一覧、ja:ハンガリー人の一覧、ja:ウクライナ人の一覧、ja:イタリア人の一覧といった一覧があることがわかります. Zargulon さんに、赤リンク部分を埋め、また一覧自体の作成にもご協力いただきたいと思い、依頼にあがりました. ja:執筆依頼・ja:翻訳依頼にも多様な依頼事項がありますので、ぜひご覧ください.

よろしければja:Wikipedia:ウィキポータル/ユダヤ教/執筆依頼の執筆・翻訳にもご参加ください（ja:Wikipedia:ウィキプロジェクト/ユダヤ教にサインしてください）.

それでは、体に気をつけて、執筆なさってください. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 12:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

New userpage
Nice userpage - at last! :-) Izehar 18:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Discussion on MCB
/MCB

Hokkaido Takushoku Bank
Sorry for the late reply, but excelent work. I am surprised that there was interest in that bank in the first place. Keep up the good work. Indiana Fats 14:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Gyokudo Kawai/Kawai Gyokudo temp
What is it exactly that you're trying to do with these? I'm here to help, just trying to sort out the situation. Thanks. Chick Bowen 02:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I think I've figured it out. On August 20 User:61.26.81.2 did a cut and paste move from Kawai Gyokudo to Gyokudo Kawai.  However, he or she left the original where it was.  Differences between them appear to be trivial.  Therefore, I'm going to delete Kawai Gyokudo temp, as you suggested with your delete tag, and leave the redirect from GK to KG.  Let me know if I've misinterpreted, because I don't want to lose any of the revision history of the current article--I can always undelete.  Thanks.  Chick Bowen 02:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I'll check the histories again and make sure everything is preserved. In the future, use the "move" button for all moves. If the page you're moving to has never been anything but a redirect to the page you're moving from, it will work. If not, it has to be done by an administrator, but you can post it at Requested moves. Thanks, and happy editing. Chick Bowen 15:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Protein-protein interaction prediction
Hi Zargulon. Are you aware of this new page: Protein-protein interaction prediction? It was off to an unlucky start, being listed on Articles for Deletion. Lambiam 07:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

List of redundant expressions
I agree that this list has no place in Wikipedia, but I guess that we are out of luck at the moment. The article doesn't seem to meet any criteria for speedy deletion, and actually it's not appropriate to use PROD either. (PROD is for unopposed deletion; a vote to delete the list has just recently failed, so it is by definition opposed.) It'll have to be solved by a new VfD (which should be started about a month after the previous one). - Mike Rosoft 12:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Re : Can you help me multiple move request?
Hi Zargulon

Firstly, go to the page you want to move. You'll see that there is a 'Move' button on every article, between 'History' and 'Watch'. Click onto it and you'll be brought to the page where you enter the new title of the article.

Make sure that there is community consensus for the articles to be moved to their new articles before you perform the articles. Please use Requested moves instead if the move is possibly contraversial.

An extended guide is avaliable at Help:Moving a page if you need further reference. Also note that the Help:Redirect feature is avaliable if you just need to create additional titles to point to an existing article. Hope that helps! :)

- Best regards, Mailer Diablo 23:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Ancient Greek Wikisource
I understand from your userboxes you're interested in Ancient Greek. I've submitted a proposal to add an Ancient Greek Wikisource on Meta, and I'd be very grateful if you could assist me by either voting in Support of the proposal, or even adding your name as one of the contributors in the template. (NB: I'm posting this to a lot of people, so please reply to my talkpage or to Meta) --Nema Fakei 20:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Trinomial theorem
Argh! Thanks for fixing my silly error on the Montessori page :) Bookgrrl 00:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Adulterers
We are in disagreement about this category, which I am resisting because it could label vast numbers of biographies and turn public opinion against Wikipedia. I will discuss it further, and if I am outvoted and ruled against then so be it, you win. But meanwhile please do not add more biographies to the category until the matter has been resolved. Viewfinder 21:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

April Fool's Day
It's back on AFD. I started a section on the Talk page, if this interests you. -Seidenstud 15:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow. You're quick.  I think you beat me to it.... -Seidenstud 15:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

about extra
Howdy Zargulon. "Extra" by itself has a meaning similar to "more", whereas "Extra-" means "out of (attached word)". The addition of punctuation makes a difference. --Fang Aili talk 19:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, but not to the meaning in this case. Since "marital affair" on its own doesn't have any meaning in the context, the only reasonable way for a reader to parse "extra marital affair" is as having the same meaning as "extra-marital affair". For sake of argument, I am happy to acknowledge that the typography may have been incorrect, but the meaning was unambiguous, which is the only point I ever made. If I wrote mouse as muse, that would have a different meaning but if I wrote moustache as mustache it would be different (wrong, here in the UK) but only by a letter, not in meaning. I also rather thought there was a disrespectful implication to your edit that the issues surrounding the deletion of the cat weren't worth addressing with the articulate and reasoned argument which I am sure you are capable of, but if you didn't intend this disrespectfully, then I apologize. Zargulon 19:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No disrespect was intended. I agreed with the reasoning of the other users who voted "delete", and didn't feel the need to go into more details. I only mentioned "extra" as a point of interest, for anyone who cared. I understand that the meaning of your text was probably not misunderstood by anyone, but just wanted to mention that there is a difference between "extra marital" and "extra-marital", regardless of many people's ignorance of this. (You can look up "extra" vs. "extra-" at m-w.com for confirmation.) It's not a big deal by any means, and again, I just mentioned it for anyone who cared. Happy editing. --Fang Aili talk 19:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Checkmate
In the checkmate article, you put "contradiction", but didn't say why on the talk page. What do you think is a contradiction? Bubba73 (talk), 15:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I got your reply. If you thought that there was a contradiction, it might be because something wasn't written clearly.  Is there anything that needs to be clarified?  Bubba73 (talk), 16:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Conversation with Blofeld
HI it is extremely useful having somebody who can translate Japanese. I am extremely impressed. To me every Japanese letter or writing looks the same - a square!! Are you Japanese or English? Either way the articles are nicely written and categorized. Well done! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 10:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Excellent! A learning curve and useful articles! I have also contributed some Japanese articles in the past temples and things like that. Hey have a look at my underground layer on my user page. Mount Fuji! idea taken from You Only Live Twice (film). All the best and keep up the great work Ernst Stavro Blofeld 10:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

To be honest with I have contibuted so many thousands of articles to wikipedia that I can't remember. There were only a few I have contributed far more to China than Japan in the far-east. Ha yes. Underground layer is a spoof term used in the Austin powers films by Doctor Evil mimicking James Bond and SPECTRE to refer to a headquarters used by an evil genius based in a volcano somewhere in Japan. It is a parody of You Only Live Twice!!Ernst Stavro Blofeld 11:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

The only one I can remember one of my poorer stubs is Shoren-in Temple. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 11:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

renormalization
No problem. It occurs to me that if we were to reference a noteworthy work on modern interpretations of renormalization, published by a professional physicist or philosopher, that might be a sensible compromise.

You asked me whether I think that the interesting debate on renormalization is historical. I don't think it's so relevant for the discussion about Chris Oakley's link, but...I do personally think the physical understanding of renormalization and the RG is much more settled, now. This physical understanding was developed from Wilson onwards.

I would say that the main remaining objections are that the mathematical rigour is missing, but this is the same as with any aspect of QFT, unfortunately. Lack of mathematical rigour doesn't stop us physicists, of course....--Jpod2 13:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Eruv
Yesterday, you added the "weasel" tag to the Eruv article. Thank you for this effort at improving the article. But unless we know which words bother you, we can't fix them. Please go to the Eruv Discussion page and specify which sections seem weaselly to you. Thanks. --Keeves 12:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Jewish services -text and language
I don't know the derivation for the statement that there are prayers that must be recited in Hebrew. I did not write that text, I merely provided a citation for the law that allows for non-Hebrew recital of the Shema. Kari Hazzard ( T  |  C ) 15:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I moved the discussion of the Shema language to Shema. It seemed more appropriate there. In Jewish services the general statement covers everything and restating the principle for selected individual prayers didn't seem to belong there as much as in the Shema article. +--Shirahadasha 18:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello, as an fyi and not as halachic advice (I don't give halakhic advice), many, many Jewish worshippers are less than fluent in Hebrew, it's a very common situation. I don't believe anyone would regard it as forbidden for them to pray in Hebrew, with the congregation or in private. One improves ones comprehension and understanding with practice and study, in this as in any matter where learning is involved. If it were forbidden one could never learn. Even native speakers have to deal with this as children. Praying in a non-hebrew language is a permission, not a requirement, and many regard it as a permission to be avoided if possible to ensure the Hebrew language continues to be studied and used. Best, --Shirahadasha 18:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Hawking
User talk:Zargulon/Discussion on Stephen Hawking peacock tag

Ger (Hasidic dynasty)
you added the peacock tag to Ger (Hasidic dynasty)

it would be helpful if you identified the words that bother you

Redaktor 01:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Words that bother me in bold :"major decisor of Jewish Law in his time", Well known among non-chasidim for his deep talmudic works. Zargulon 10:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

What would you write? Redaktor 12:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please see my recent edit of the page itself. Zargulon 12:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Hyperemesis gravidarum
I hadn't noticed "hypersalvation" until you corrected it... what a nice typo. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 11:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Holocaust Memorial Day (UK)
I've moved the claim to Talk: for further discussion. Thanks for letting me know. Jayjg (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hypocrisy
Please do not remove citations. If they are inaccurate paraphrases, make them accurate instead. Thanks! Jokestress 19:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Nihonga
Thank you very much!--MChew 14:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Sixty six (film)
I replied to your question at my talk page. -- Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 13:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Esashi
Hi, I saw your excellent translation work on Takugin Bank and was wondering if you could please work your magic on Esashi? I can see you've got a lot on your plate and I have to admit I've got no better reason for the request other than that the towns in Hiyama/Oshima get a great kick out of knowing they have an English wikipedia page. (I did the Assabu page and I'm constantly promising people in the Esashi supermarket that I'll find a wikipedian who can provide their page...) Anyway all the best whether you've time for it or not. Cheers Saganaki- 04:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, yes that's Esashi, Hokkaido (Hiyama) - sorry for not being clearer. Page watched! Cheers Saganaki- 14:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just released I hadn't thanked you for your work on Esashi. Thanks so much for your help! Cheers Saganaki- 02:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Orthodox/Reform
I appreciate your candor and apologize if I seemed forthright. Thank you for doing a beautiful job in clearing this up. DRosenbach (Talk 23:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Odo
Sorry, it took me a long time to respond. I have felt very reluctant to check that talk page again, since I felt the response I got was pretty harsch and didn't put me in a happy mood. I think I've said what I have to say on the topic. atm we are two how have voiced one opinion, and one person who has disagreed - I think I leave it there for the futur.

Btw, this image is kind of a relevant comment http://waffleimages.nwpshost.com/files/1e/1ed90668cc80a6bb240dc99f749ab87fabe26221.gif // habj 15:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Helpme! With drop-down sections of pages
Hi, I want to make a drop-down feature on a WP page.. For instance in Category pages you can click on the plus sign to get all the subcats of a category. I want to do that with a regular section of text on a regular WP page.

How do I do this?

The particular application is for song lyrics.. I want the song lyrics to be "hidden" by default on the WP page about the song, then someone can click on the sign to drop them down. Just like for subcats.

Thanks Zargulon 18:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know about the plus sign but you can get a show/hide drop down box by using a NAVFRAME. Hope that helps. Keeping the helpme template on so that someone who knows better will come along and answer. - Two Oars 18:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

That should suffice. Edit conflict — «   A NIMUM  »  18:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * How's this? — «  A NIMUM  »  18:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Dayenu
I fixed the problem with Dayenu. In order to fix this type of problem, you need a mysterious and magical ASCII character called the "Right-to-left mark." It takes up no space, so it is hard to see. I provide it for you here between two brackets: [‏]. It's also accessible in the Windows Character Map, about 2/3 of the way down the list (U+200F). If you insert this character after the line in question, it is magically fixed. Shabbat Shalom! --Eliyak T · C 20:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Adding peacock template
Could you please explain on the article talk pages of Richard Feynman and Srinivasa Ramanujan where there appears to be peacock terms? I'm working on Ramanujan at the moment, and I probably know what particular words ("genius" for example) you're referring to, but it would be better if you could explain yourself on the talk page to other editors who may not understand why the tag was added in the first place. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy
Please check WP:CSD A7 the standard for speedy is there be no assertion of notability or importance -- not that the person is actually going to be notable. for someone to say they are the director of an Institute (or of anything substantial) is an assertion of importance. DGG (talk) 18:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

nn
I assume you have some sort of bot in order to churn out all those sub sorts, but what's with all the "non-notable" tags you're slapping down on scientist articles? You can't actually be reading that many articles that quickly, so I assume you're - hmmm, maybe applying them whenever there's no reference citations? Anyway, that is such an incredibly ugly, reader-jarring box - one of the ugliest we've got - that it should be used cautiously. - DavidWBrooks 19:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow: editing 47 different articles in the past hour, and an equal rate before that! I bow down before your energy: You must be a *human* bot! - DavidWBrooks 20:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Richard Feynman
Zargulon,

First, apologies for the what appears to have been a bit of a blowup on the Feynman talk page. I came in in the middle, and you seemed to be the only one arguing against what I would have considered reasonable. However, per our later discussion, the bulk of the argument (sans nastiness) really just looks like different philosophies on Wiki-worthiness. I think our talk pages are a better place for such a high-level discussion than the article talk page, but I'd still like to understand where you're coming from.

Since most of our later discussion was about Feynman's personality (specifically his sense of humor), let's start there. Reading back over your comments, I'm finding it hard to determine whether you object to describing the personalities of notable people in general, or whether you were objecting specifically to how the Feynman article incorporated that discussion. Can you clarify your position on this?

Thanks, Ryan McDaniel 03:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Ryan.. Which exactly do you mean by personality.. the character that he creates for himself in his books, or the impression that other people said they had of him? I don't object to including either provided they are described accurately, sourced, and not given undue weight. Zargulon 07:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, so here's perhaps part of the problem. Having read many of his books, and talked with probably a dozen people that knew him (I went to Caltech, can't speak for his personality anywhere else), I don't think there's much of a difference between "the character that he create[d] for himself" and "the impression that other people said they had".  That said, my interpretation of your comment is that anything anyone says about themselves is inherently suspect.  Is that what you meant to imply? &mdash;Ryan McDaniel 13:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * No.. and I can't see that that is a fair interpretation of my comment! But suit yourself. Anyway, I'm happy to talk about any specific example, but since you mentioned his sense of humour, let's start there. He says he got his sense of humour from his mother. That's probably not a statement he (or anyone else) would make with the intention of standing it up to rigorous scrutiny.. there were as likely as not other contributors to whatever sense of humour he had. In my experience the normal way to deal with such a quote that is to present it as a quote or in indirect speech ("in Feynman says.." ) and not to presume it is true (as is currently the case in the article). .. would you have a problem with that? Zargulon 13:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Sure (or rather, no I wouldn't have a problem). I think "Feynman attributed his sense of humor to his mother[1]" or similar would be just fine. &mdash;Ryan McDaniel 14:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Great! Do I have permission to edit the article?(!) Zargulon 14:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Jack Halpern
Hi there. I've removed your non-notable tag from Jack Halpern as he won the Willard Gibbs Award, which satisfies notability requirements. Please come and help expand the article! Carcharoth 11:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Je te veux
A tag has been placed on Je te veux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. fschoenm (talk) 13:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Haskalah
I removed it because it was incomprehensible. However, I doubt it will stay removed for long. Jayjg (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Category sorting
I see that you have been adding category sorting to articles using markup of the form. This is not the correct markup; it should be, with a colon. For more about this, see Categorization. (But thank you: even with the incorrect markup up it is better than nothing.) —Paul A (talk) 04:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Docking
It is indeed sexcruft, but it's not the kind of issue I'm keen to get involved in. Sorry. Jayjg (talk) 03:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the compliment
I appreciate the "well argued nomination" comment! Timneu22 (talk) 00:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nishida Shunei
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nishida Shunei, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Enki H. (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Zone Libre
Thanks for this article - could you stick references in? Obviously we don't expect users to produce complete articles in one go, but some references in any starting draft would be nice. Ironholds (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)