User talk:Zaubermann1986

Speedy deletion nomination of Ingrid Wenz-Gahler
Hello Zaubermann1986,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ingrid Wenz-Gahler for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ingrid Wenz-Gahler


A tag has been placed on Ingrid Wenz-Gahler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 12:03, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Advice

 * I removed this as advertising, bot because of lack of asserted significance. Wee WP:BIO for haw we handle biographical subjects. We describe their work, we don't advertise for their services.  DGG ( talk ) 05:19, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MacGuardians


A tag has been placed on MacGuardians, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cayman296 (talk) 17:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Antonius Quodt. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Photograph attribution
You have uploaded and asserted it as "own work". However here the same photo is attributed to Natalie Bothur, on a copyrighted page. AllyD (talk) 21:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Macinplay
Hello Zaubermann1986,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Macinplay for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Schetm (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Advice
I did not delete it. It did indicate some significance. But it will probable be deleted after a discussion if you do not add some content and references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements.  DGG ( talk ) 05:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Antonius Quodt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonius Quodt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antonius Quodt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Macinplay
Hello, Zaubermann1986. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Macinplay, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Schetm (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)