User talk:Zaxem

Is Edit Counts that important?
In my opinion, edit counts do not necessarily reflect the value and faithfulness one is toward Wikipedia. I questioned that why is everyone opposing someone from becoming an administrator if their edit count is only 1500? You can create 1500 articles and only counts as 1500 edit counts. Unlike some others, who is "faking" edit counts, they created 1500 articles with an edit count as high as 15000. Why? What is the difference between the two? The only one I could think of is that one does not have an adminship, but the one with 15000 edit count does. This is VERY unfair, I am sorry to say.

-- Smcafirst or Nick  • Sign   • Chit-Chat •  I give ''' at 00:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Won't stay dead
Please see Articles for deletion/Plastic Paddy. Looks like it's deja vu all over again. -999 (Talk) 03:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Amy Fisher copyright violation
It appears that you added text to the Amy Fisher article in September 2005 that seems to be a word-for-word copy of copyrighted information from http:// amyelizabethfisher.com/bio.html. I have put up a copyvio tag on this page and added a link on the Copyright problems page. --rogerd 03:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is very interesting. I certainly recognize the text that's on the Bio page of the [http:// amyelizabethfisher.com/bio.html amyelizabethfisher.com] website. It's almost exactly what I wrote for the Wikipedia page back in September 2005, which you've spotted. I don't know if the amyelizabethfisher.com website even existed back then - I suspect it didn't becuase I'm sure I'd have found it while Google searching information for the article if it had; but until you pointed it out to me I've never come across this website. I think it must be fairly new. I certainly didn't copy anything from it into the Wikipedia article. It appears that the website has lifted the text of the Wikipedia page and used it as their bio. My sources of information when I edited the article were another Amy Fisher website - www.amyfisher.com - which was alreday listed as an external link in the article before I edited it; and a few news articles I found on the web, most notably www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/young/amy_fisher, which I added as an extra external link at the article when I edited it. Zaxem 04:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * We can just put it back and perhaps put a note next to the external link that the text was copied from wikipedia. Since it is her official site, it seemed a little strange that she or her representative would write that bio that has some negative aspects.  If they did lift it from the text that you (and others) wrote for wikipedia, they would have a log of chutzpa putting a copyright notice on it.  --rogerd 04:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Per WHOIS entry for amyelizabethfisher.com, the entry of the text in question predates the existence of amyelizabethfisher.com. This is not a copyright violation.  In fact, amyelizabethfisher.com is wrongfully asserting copyright to information that was obviously obtained from GDFL wikipedia. The previous contents have been restored.  --rogerd 23:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi. I've been cleaning up spam and came across the link above. That domain is now blacklisted as a spam site. Since the blacklisting software filters block editing pages with those links, I've taken the liberty of disabling the link for you.


 * Good catch on the copyright violation, by the way. The site's owner has spammed >140 sites across this Wikipedia and dozens of others (Russian, french, etc) The sites are all junk. See meta:Talk:Spam blacklist for more details. --A. B. (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Derrick Rostagno
I have added a "" template to the article Derrick Rostagno, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 03:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Tennis page IP vandalism
Thanks for all your help. It's getting tough, but we shall prevail! Here's a list based on one IP address which has vandalized many more tennis pages including players who are not that famous (your help is greatly appreciated!) : Mats Wilander Michael Chang Michael Stich Jim Courier Patrick Rafter Boris Becker Stefan Edberg Goran Ivanišević Yevgeny Kafelnikov Gustavo Kuerten Jim Courier Alberto Berasategui Sergi Bruguera Petr Korda Carlos Moyà Àlex Corretja Vitas Gerulaitis Greg Rusedski Thomas Enqvist Guillermo Vilas Mats Wilander Marcos Baghdatis Kevin Curren MaliVai WashingtonYannick Noah John Lloyd (tennis) Thomas Muster Fernando González

You've already contributed to a lot of these, but hopefully there are some more that you should be aware of. Thanks again. Supertigerman 03:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes! I like your bolded version. In fact, I didn't mind the new version that much, only that they were doing it without discussing it and reaching a consensus. And the IP guy is right about the order of scoring for losses. In all other sources, a loss is written from the perspective of the player, hence the sets he lost would be 3-6 not 6-3. I'm all for that, but what are we going to do? Just go to every page and make it all bold, or somehow tell the IP guy to do it too? Supertigerman 17:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That isn't true. Here is a quote from an August 2006 edition of the New York Times:  "Second-seeded Rafael Nadal lost to Juan Carlos Ferrero, 7-6 (2), 7-6 (3), yesterday in a matchup of Spaniards in the quarterfinals of the Western & Southern Financial Group Masters in Mason, Ohio."  Another example from an Associated Press story this year: "Top-seeded Rafael Nadal lost to Xavier Malisse 6-4, 7-6 (4) Saturday in the semifinals of the Chennai Open."  No doubt I could find many other examples if necessary.  edited by Tennis expert 04:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * More examples. (1) Bud Collins writing on MSNBC.com on September 10, 2006: "I know that many tennis fans might be disappointed that Andy Roddick lost to Roger Federer, 6-2, 4-6, 7-5, 6-1 in the men's singles final at the U.S. Open."  (2) News on tennis.com on January 16, 2007:  "In last September's Davis Cup semifinal between the United States and Russia, Roddick lost to Dmitry Tursunov 6-3, 6-4, 5-7, 3-6, 17-15 in the decisive fourth match."  (3) Match notes on tennis-x.com on November 16, 2006:  "Tournament History: Lost to James Blake 64 76(0) in his opening match, before defeating Tommy Robredo 76(2) 62."  (4) News article on www.australianopen.com on January 26, 2007:  "Klein ... is anticipating another crack at Eysseric, who he lost to last week, 7-6(2) 6-2."  (5) News article on www.australianopen.com on January 22, 2007:  "Chakvetadze ... believes she is a much more complete player now that when she lost to Sharapova 4-6 6-4 7-5 in Los Angeles in 2005."  (6) Post-match analysis on www.usopen.org on September 8, 2006:  "Jankovic’s Cinderella run in the 2006 US Open ended in the semifinals, as she lost to No. 2 seed Justine Henin-Hardenne in three sets, 4-6, 6-4, 6-0."  (7) International Tennis Hall of Fame biography of Dorothy Round Little:  "That same year in the U.S. Championships, she lost to Jacobs, 6-4, 5-7, 6-2, in the semifinals." (8) London Times report about the Davis Cup tie between Russia and Argentina on December 4, 2006:  "Russia beat Argentina 3-2 (Russia names first) Singles: N Davydenko bt J I Chela 6-1, 6-2, 5-7, 6-4; M Safin lost to D Nalbandian 6-4, 6-4, 6-4.  Doubles: Safin and D Tursunov bt Nalbandian and A Calleri 6-2, 6-3, 6-4.  Reverse singles: Davydenko lost to Nalbandian 6-2, 6-2, 4-6, 6-4; Safin bt J Acasuso 6-3, 3-6, 6-3, 7-6."  Tennis expert 20:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm with you Zaxem. The whole line should be bolded, and yes, we have to listen to others' opinions before implementing the new format. I left a note on Tennis Expert's page, and am awaiting his reaction, as he has reverted edits but not discussed your proposed format thus far. Supertigerman 03:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Making the runners-up names bold in the wins rows probably isn't necessary; but either way I'm fine. Supertigerman 03:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Zaxem. Thanks for your message. My opinion: I think this format is very confusing. The point of the GS section is to provide detailed info on opponents and scores. The top priority is wins, so they should definitely have a table of their own. Being runner-up is subsidiary, and could actually be removed in my opinion. If it should be mentioned, it should definitely not be in same table as wins. Boldface does nothing here, except highlighting the player names that did not win. Could be confusing. As to the argument that one can see that a player has played several consecutive finals (and won some and lost some), I think that is not valid here. For that purpose, we have the performance time-line. So, I think the format should not be implemented. As to how the scores are presented in the runner-up subsection, I have no preference. Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HJensen" --HJ 17:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Runners-up versus runner-ups
Hello there. What is the source for the information you placed on my discussion page (and your reverts)? Tennis expert 23:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

 * Thanks for voting in my RfA. I've decided to withdraw my acceptance because of real WP:CIVIL concerns.  I will try again later when I've proven to myself and others that my anger will no longer interfere with my abilities as a Wikipedia editor.  Thanks again, and I'll see you around here shortly. :) JuJube 04:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --Anthony.bradbury 16:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Greenboxed's RfA

 * Thanks for your positive feedback for my RfA. I really appriciate it. Greenboxed 00:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

YechielMan's RFA
Thank you for participating in either of my unsuccessful requests for adminship. Although the experience was frustrating, it showed me some mistakes I was making, and I hope to learn from those mistakes.

Please take a few minutes to read User:YechielMan/Other stuff/RFA review and advise me how to proceed. Best regards. Yechiel Man 22:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfA
Thanks for your support in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated. IvoShandor 16:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Nehrams2020 RfA Thanks
Thank you for your participation in my RfA, which closed successfully with unanimous support. I appreciate you taking the time to stop by and vote and I can't wait to learn the new tools and further immerse myself into Wikipedia! Please don't hesitate to point out any errors I make so I can prevent them from occurring again. I'm always here to help, so if you ever need anything, just let me know. Also, thanks to Wizardman for nominating me and for guiding many other editors to become admins. Again, thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 07:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Fabrictramp RFA
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 16:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

very nice
Hi Zaxem,

I just wanted to commend you on your great maturity in handling the dialogue between yourself, maybe others, and Tennis Expert way back when at User talk:Tennis expert I actually had a good time reading it, and have just now for current purposes written a long suggestion note to Tennis Expert about his constant edit warring and reversion of some decent edits. It's one thing to revert vandalism (which I like doing and became a member for such a reason), but it's another thing to revert good edits just because you think you are the "expert" which his name seems to imply anyway, which comes as no surprise I guess. Anyway, hopefully he and everyone will learn to be happy with point of viewing "less than perfect" edits, because only God is perfect anyway.

take care ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I just spent 11 minutes writing to Tennis expert, and rather than read and respond cordially, he goes and once again, reverts my entire edit and attacks me in his edit summary. Something should be done about this, no? Because it really is repelling from wikipedia itself to members and IPs, and IPs considering becoming members. ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Sigh.... Now I think I've upset him and caused him to start an edit war. Hopefully he will calm, and realize no one is trying to attack him, just have a conversation. I should be doing my homework instead. ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 01:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

thankspam
Considering I didn't reveal my previous accounts or contribs, it's more than fair to oppose on the grounds you did. I appreciate your taking the time to weigh in. See you 'round!  Mr. IP  《 Defender of Open Editing 》 14:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ken Binns
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ken Binns, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ken Binns (2nd nomination). Thank you. Koshoes (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Ken Binns
A tag has been placed on Ken Binns, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Koshoes (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC) This page is being deleted in accordance with the ongoing Tsvangairai case. Susan Tsvangarai is a very notable woman but she has been nominated for deletion on the non notability/empty page (in which she has a very full one). Now if Ken Binns, a 2nd place in the doubles of a USA American Hardball Squash tournament in 1971 is more notable, then I will eat my socks, hat, and anything els that comes flying my way. Koshoes (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created: Ken Binns  may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Ken Binns .

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted Findsources3:
 * Find sources for Ken Binns : google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
 * 1) List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
 * 3) When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
 * 4) You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

BLP warning
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Hipocrite (talk) 14:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I have now added sources. Zaxem (talk) 14:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hipocrite (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I do not think I'm violating BLP or making disriptive edits. I'm trying to source the article. As you know, I have voted to delete the article. But I believe the issue is notability, not verifiability. Everything that's been put in is verifiable over the web, and I'm adding sources to show this. I still don't think she's notable, but right now I think a fully detailed article should remain in order to allow people to read it and consider it fairly while the AfD process goes on. I'm trying to help allow that process to happen properly. So I will be adding back in some of what you've taken out, but I promise I will only do so while at the same time adding reliable sources. Zaxem (talk) 15:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zaxem! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 19 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Eric Jensen (educator) -
 * 2) Carl Chang (tennis) -
 * 3) Jonathan Stark -
 * 4) Brett Martin -
 * 5) Danielle Drady-Harte -
 * 6) Anthony Ricketts -
 * 7) Ibrahim Amin -
 * 8) Rhonda Thorne -
 * 9) Sue Cogswell -
 * 10) Margaret Zachariah -

11. Sue Newman 12. Martin Mulligan 13. Shelley Kitchen 14. Steven Bailey (television executive) 15. Diehl Mateer 16. Sam Howe 17. Ralph Howe 18. Rainer Ratinac 19. Joe Hursley

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steven Bailey (television executive)


The article Steven Bailey (television executive) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP. The reference doesn't say much at all about the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unitasock (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eric Jensen (educator)


The article Eric Jensen (educator) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 07:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Zaxem/Sandbox
User:Zaxem/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zaxem/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Zaxem/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Codf1977 (talk) 14:31, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Randi Coy for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Randi Coy, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Randi Coy until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Taylor (squash player)


The article Nick Taylor (squash player) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The article doesn't show any references. The article claims that they reached 14 in the world, but there is no proof of that anywhere or articles from the PSA saying that. The article does not show any notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)