User talk:Zblace/Disclosure

need some help with this
Hi @Barkeep49 !

Could you please check if this is correct and what would you change to make it better? --Zblace (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the ping @Zblace. My first thought is that you don't link which from an enwiki perspective was a big part of the problem. Once you add that would you be OK if I did a copyedit? Barkeep49 (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @Barkeep49 sure. Please do. I never really know what is adequate (if anything) and can not judge the tone in written English both culturally and in syntax. Thank you. --Zblace (talk) 20:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @Zblace I have done the copy edit. Please check that I have not changed the meaning of anything you wanted. Thanks for including QueerSEE. However, your write-up makes it sound like you never edited English Wikipedia with that account. A big reason that QueerSEE was a problem on English Wikipedia was because you violated our WP:COI guideline by creating User:Yupik/Queer Sport Split. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @Barkeep49 thank you for corrections. I see some were also really trivial I should have spotted in second reading.
 * As for COI, it was something I was not able to defend, as no one would listen...Anyway if that was even the case it was not COI with insentive for direct benefit (how would that be possible for small queer NGO in homophobic Dalmatia), nor agressive action woth blocking an account IMHO. Article was started as a research to see if Simple EN Wikipedia can be used as proxy between CEE languages for translation campaign CEE Spring with queer content. It was already noted by few people that Simple is actually packed with blocked EN users, who are actually native and monolingual (hence against initial intent of Simple as project). Does that make sense? --Zblace (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)