User talk:Zdyjl68

March 2015
Hello, I'm Sam Sailor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to LabVIEW because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 01:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sensor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sensor was changed by Zdyjl68 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975002 on 2015-03-16T13:06:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent edits to Wireless sensor network
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wireless sensor network, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 13:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 14:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Why is this user getting all these pile-on warnings?
I am not seeing their edits as being vandalism or disruptive. Sure, a couple of articles needed reverting because the user, like many newbies, has misunderstood the purpose of disambiguation pages, but it is not helpful to start threatening blocks. It would be much more constructive to explain how those pages are used here rather than give a templated vandalism warning. The warning from Cluebot to my mind is an error so I have restored the edit and reported it as a false positive. Everyone else - please stop looking at the warnings already here and assuming you are dealing with more like it and adding yet another warning. Instead judge the edit on its own merits. SpinningSpark 15:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)