User talk:Ze972

Original research and unsourced material
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rustamid dynasty, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. This applies also to information communicated through images, such as flags or maps presenting historical information. R Prazeres (talk) 18:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Ze972, you have just tried to re-insert your original research at the Rustamid dynasty page after it was already reverted. If you do this again your account may be reported for edit-warring (see WP:EDITWAR for what this means) and you may be blocked from further editing. Instead of repeating the same edits after they've been reverted, you may discuss your proposed edits at the article's talk page. R Prazeres (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You have yet again added unsourced original research at Hammadid dynasty, despite an earlier warning about this behaviour on another article. This constitutes disruptive editing. Once again, if you continue to add or re-add your own original research to articles you may be reported to the administrators' noticeboard. R Prazeres (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zirid dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Sagrajas, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Zirid dynasty and Battle of Sagrajas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. R Prazeres (talk) 22:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Abu Malik Abdulwahid
Hello, Ze972. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abu Malik Abdulwahid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Abu Malik Abdulwahid


Hello, Ze972. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Abu Malik Abdulwahid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 00:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)