User talk:ZebraCake245

Original research
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not the news
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

I can understand the part with the Baltimore Sun article but I'm not understanding why the lead content has been removed is there a way I can reword that so that you will keep it here I think it is important to know. ZebraCake245 (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Final warning for WP:NOTNEWS disruption
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

So are you just not going to tell me what's wrong ZebraCake245 (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I have tried to contact you multiple times with absolutely no response so if you continue to do this I would continue to make account and change the edit until you give me a proper response as to what is the issue ZebraCake245 (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The WP:NOTNEWS link you've been directed to already explains rationale. Pledging to edit-war and create multiple accounts is not a sound strategy. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It is not our responsibility to tell you here what all was wrong, though I can certainly say that adding some stuff about what is on a school website is not of encyclopedic concern--it has never been so, and it never will be. If you don't understand that you don't know what an encyclopedia is. Instead of complaining about how you've not been explained in detail what all was wrong, you could a. read the links that were provided to you and b. learn what this encyclopedia does and does not deem noteworthy, for instance in school articles. And you might find out, along the way, that one should look for Good Articles and Featured Articles to get a good idea on what is considered good here. Educate yourself--or continue, and be blocked. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)