User talk:Zedder84

Removal of speedy delete tags
Hi, please don't remove speedy delete tags without leaving at least an explanation in your edit summary for why you're doing so. It's also preferable that you leave them for an admin to review, especially in the case of a clear issue like with the David Earl Williams III‎ page where it's previously been removed by consensus. JamesG5 (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Repost of David Earl Williams III
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. JamesG5 (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Willywill3x. Thank you. JamesG5 (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)