User talk:Zeeyanwiki/Archive 2

CVUA
 Theo polisme  (public) 23:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Zeeyanketu, welcome to the CVUA! I will be your instructor and hope that you'll have a really great experience, and learn along the way. I have created an academy page specifically for you, located at User:ItsZippy/CVUA/Zeeyanketu, which we will use to track your progress (there is an introduction there, which will explain things a little better). I like to tailor my courses to my students, so if there is anything that you would like to cover in more detail, or anything you think I could do better, please let me know. I am also available for more general advice about anti-vandalism, so please ask me if you ever have any questions. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

RE
ETT So you will decide what is the best format? Don't boss around.--almightyvegeta (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Top Most respected critics should come first. That should be the order from now.

Don't fight and agree with it.--almightyvegeta (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Putting Taran Adarsh's Review on top is disrespect to wikipedia itself. I suggest not to include his reviews in future. Masand and Anupama are the most respected critics ask anyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almightyvegeta (talk • contribs) 20:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC) TA is a Box office critic not a film critic. If you are on twitter then you'll know what Taran's reputation is. His Sold old reviews should be barred from wiki.--almightyvegeta (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. When you recently edited Ek Tha Tiger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for nett gross in India for Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia.com cannot be used as official reference(tracker) for Bollywood films nett collections in India. BoxofficeIndia is not updating its website on a regular basis ,so the reports og nett collections in India are reported very late on its website.Also, Wikipedia is not able to utilize lists of film grosses created by Box Office India, until permission is provided to the Wikimedia Foundation of permission by Box Office India. Respected critics such as Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta are giving regualar and genuine nett collection figures in India for Bollywood films.Taran Adarsh has website www.bollywoodhungama.com      and Komal Nahta has website  www.koimoi.com     We can also use OneIndia.com,  The Times of India as sources it doesn’t means that a magazine like Hindustan Times or The hindu will not  report genuine sources ,compared to a not so updated website of BoxofficeIndia.com BoxofficeIndia should be used only when other sources stop giving gross report.First bring a consensus on this nett gross issue. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for worldwide gross and overseas gross of Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia has demerit that it is not giving overseas reports of films on a regular basis.It will show figues only once or twice,So u cannot include BoxofficeIndia figures. Also,When u wil see infobox of Holywood films,they have worldwide gross. So try to include worldwide gross which includes domestic gross(nett gross in India+entertainment tax) and overseas gross. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
Hi Zeeyanketu, your first task is waiting for you at your academy page. It would be helpful if you could add that page to your watchlist, so that I don't need to let you know every time anything changes. Is that ok? Let me know if you have any problems. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Jannat 2 reviews
I've managed to get the user who was inserting quotations from dozens of reviews into Jannat 2 to talk on the article talk page. We're trying to come to a consensus as to what exactly to include in reviews. It's certainly true that we need more than what is currently in the article, but less than Josephjames.me was adding. As one of the previous reverters, could you please join the discussion at Talk:Jannat 2, and help us figure out what and how much to include? Qwyrxian (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)