User talk:Zeeyanwiki/Archive 4

ETT Critical reception
Why are you changing ETT Critical reception again and again. Top most respected critics should come first.--almightyvegeta (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

As expected you are obnoxious and no point talking to you.--almightyvegeta (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
Hi there Zeeyanketu. You still have outstanding tasks waiting on your CVUA academy page. If you're having any problems please do let me know. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There is still a few tasks you need to complete - how are you doing? ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Comment on User talk:Ghajinidetails
Please note that I responded to the comment you left at User talk:Ghajinidetails, because your representation of Wikipedia policies to the new user was not correct. You may want to follow up either there or here. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Ek Tha Tiger
Hi! I saw your message. I am going to change the whole page, later. Hope it is good. Josephjames.me (talk) 09:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry Zeeyanketu. I haven't seen the film.--Najazjalal (talk) 11:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I will try my best to help you make ETT a good article. And keep up the good work.--Najazjalal (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
What is inappropriate about the image added for Rowdy Rathore; why is it considered vandalism. Thank you. ---vgrichards talk to me  —Preceding undated comment added 03:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

I do not agree. This is the actual album art for the movie siundtrack. The look is also simlqar to the movie poster. Thank you. ---vgrichards talk to me  —Preceding undated comment added 04:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

here you go http://www.amazon.com/Rowdy-Rathore-Bollywood-Shreya-Ghoshal/dp/B0082MAJV8/ref=sr_1_2?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1347945064&sr=1-2&keywords=Rowdy+Rathore Thank you. ---vgrichards talk to me  —Preceding undated comment added 05:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

BJP
I don't think you have a good source either - a lot of the information I removed or changed was un-sourced. The BJP was never a economically liberal party. "Capitalistic" is a strange word as capitalism is an economic system, not a policy, and even then is open to interpretation - look at the Wikipedia pages of conservative parties like the Conservative Party (UK), the Liberal Party of Australia, Conservative Party (Canada) or the Republican Party (United States) - the description "capitalistic" is rarely if ever used, despite the fact these parties are well to the fiscal right of the BJP. There is also no reference to any economic liberalism on the official BJP website. The BJP advocate Integral humanism (India), which rejects the capitalist economic system - it is more like the Third Way (centrism) or the Third Position in this sense.

The BJP is certainly generally more fiscally conservative than the INC, but that does not automatically make it a bastion of classical liberalism. The BJP has a lot of anti-free market policies and rhetoric. The party swears allegiance to socialism, frequently makes alliances with far-left parties, supports Swadeshi, aspects of Green politics and frequently criticizes and protests against trans-national corporations.

The best way to describe the ideology of the BJP is listing those policies openly advocated by the party itself and then mentioning the other policies of individual party members under an internal factions subheading - Narendra Modi's views don't necessarily reflect those of the party overall, which has many protectionists and socialists.--Jay942942 (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

What exactly is the problem with a factions section? Is it not reasonable to put policies that are not directly advocated by the party itself there, and policies that are above that?--Jay942942 (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

I haven't really changed anything in the factions section, just re-arranged it. --Jay942942 (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Also, a lot of my other additions, like social justice were from a working version of the broken citation at the end of the paragraph. I have now updated it with the latest working version. --Jay942942 (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, keep up the good work! --Jay942942 (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks a lot. And I wish you all the best for your future edits. :) --S.M.A.R.O.J.I.T 07:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

IBC Motion Pictures
I wanted to notify you that I have removed the proposed deletion tag you added because it is redundant to the AfD nomination and unnecessary tags overwhelm the article. Cheers! SwisterTwister  talk  03:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
Hi there Zeeyanketu. I'm really sorry but I have struggled to find time to get your final exam with the CVUA done since I started university. I am confident of your ability to identify and revert vandalism; do you think you could ask another CVUA volunteer to give you your final assessment? ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 09:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary
Zeeyanketu, please leave a summary when you perform an edit, especially if it is controversial. Reverting continuously without a summary is considered deliberate disruption and may land you in trouble. You may find info of relevance at WP:EDIT SUMMARY. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Sonakshi Sinha
Someone has vandalized the page Sonakshi Sinha. Please revert vandalism on the page as soon as possible. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.75.244 (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Ek Tha Tiger
Hi, the issue seems to be that Box Office India hasn't given a verdict for Ek Tha Tiger yet, but they should have done as it is at the end of the run. For the benefit of the viewers of the article, something should be done to indicate its success. For example, Trade Analyst Taran Adarsh of BollywoodHungama, the source of the figures quoted by all of the media, gave an 'all-time blockbuster' verdict. Please do something.

Thanks.

I'll look into my edit for Bol Bachchan - I don't recall making one if I'm honest.

Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factual Proof (talk • contribs) 16:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Zeeyanketu. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 06:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Ek Tha Tiger (Incomplete Article)
Dear Friend. The page Ek Tha tiger is still incomplete even after a long time of the film's release. A lot of records broken by the Film are not mentioned in any part of the page. For Example Opening day net gross, Single day net gross, Opening weekend net gross (First 3 Days of Release),Opening week nett gross (First 7 Days of Release), Highest-grossing films in month of August and also the Second highest groosing bollywood film of all time. Ek tha tiger holds all these records and you can see it on the page List of highest-grossing Bollywood films. I mentioned all these in the page but i don't know why you reverted all the Edits done. So plz add these details or let me add these details to the page for making it a better and complete page. Thanks. (Dr. Shahid Alam)(talk) 18:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

 * Thanx a lot but my name is not mentioned in The STiki leaderboard. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Checking now, it is. The leaderboard only updates once daily (1AM Eastern U.S. time), I assume you looked at the leaderboard before it had been updated after your first use. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled reviewer rights on your account. This gives you the ability to: Please remember that this user right:
 * Accept changes on pages undergoing pending changes,
 * Have your changes automatically accepted on pending changes level 2 protected pages, and
 * Administrate article feedback.
 * Can be removed at any time for misuse, and
 * Does not grant you any special status above other editors.
 * You should probably also read WP:PROTECT, since this user privilege deals largely with page protection. As the requirements for this privilege are still in a state of flux, I would encourage you to keep up to date on the WP:REVIEWER page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions! Happy editing! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:58, 29 October 2012

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar. I hope you also will continue to revert vandalism and also the good work you are doing (like updating box office numbers). Torreslfchero (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Rowdy Rathore
I was scared when you said you reported me to WP:AIV! Anyways I am interested for the GA review of Rowdy Rathore. Cheers Plea$ant 1623  ✉  14:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

About Kira Eggers
I am irritated that you keep changing my official website to kiraeggers.com when its not. its www.dkira.com Nothing else. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikkipips (talk • contribs) 21:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks very much
Thank you for your recent helpful contribution to the WP:GA quality rated article, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate. :) Perhaps if you're interested in the subject matter, you'd like to join WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Vidya Balan edits
Why don't you understand that if i have made edits those are not non-constructive edit, I have provided reliable sources for each that means whatever i have added, are 100% true So there should not be any reason for reverting, Your edit will be reverted in Vidya Balan Greatuser (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Reply: poster
There will no copyright issues if one poster is added. If I had a choice, I'd pick the second one you gave. In order to upload it, the size of the poster must be reduced to an extent (I usually keep it less then 500*500) and a fair use rationale must be added. Refer to past upload if you want as a sample. Secret of success ·  talk  07:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Budget of Son of Sardar
What is the Budget of Son of Sardar? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.181.114 (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Re Son of Sardaar (soundtrack)
Yes, I think it is an unnecessary fork. The information is optimum enough to be included within the film article Son of Sardaar. IMO, delete the soundtrack article.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Son of sardaar(soundtrack) separate page needed on wikipedia
after 1 months of having separate page on wikipedia.there is no need to merge .and that at a time when film is released today and from today more sources and data will be coming for its reception in overseas and india and also its boxoffice figures in india and overases.moreover i will try to put more source and data abt is soundtrack on its soundtrack page.please have a thorough discussion.,remove and the unncessary template and keep the protection template only..--Filmonline111 (talk) 10:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Reliable Sources
Clearly you have not read the guidelines for reliable sources on wikipedia. So here they are. Please read them so you can stop vandalizing the Jab Tak Hai Jaan page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS

Edit Warring

 * Hello Zeeyanketu. See the complaint at AN3. I do not agree that there is vandalism, but there is definitely edit warring. Admins may be tempted to block both parties. I do not see any comments by either of you at Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan. This makes it hard for an outsider to tell what the dispute is about. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 06:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You made no reply to my above comment, you still have posted nothing about this dispute at Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan, and nevertheless you are continuing to revert the article. I have protected it for three days. During the protection I hope to see you engage in discussion with others, so that we don't see renewed warring and possible blocks when protection ends. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok sir i will add it on talk page and I didnt revert today instead made a copy paste with proper edit summary and also discussed with user who add it. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
I suggest you check the facts before accusing someone of vandalism. Thank you and goodbye. Film Fan (talk) 19:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You move the page yourself without discussing.You have to learn the facts not me. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:30, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Uncontroversial page moves do not need to be discussed. Tell me now how there is anything remotely controversial about it. Film Fan (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok ,Let us suppose i like the previous one as better and i will move it again then whats the benefit of reverting again and again. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:JDLI Film Fan (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * @Zeeyanketu: following up on your AIV report: if you like the old name better, the proper thing to do is to talk about the specific name you have in mind with Film Fan and, if you both can't come to an agreement, then you can go to requested moves and start a discussion on the matter. Uncontroversial bold moves don't require a prior discussion just for the sake of discussion. (and of course, they don't count as vandalism either.) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 20:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)