User talk:Zefrrr

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joey De Jesus (April 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joey De Jesus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joey De Jesus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Joey_De_Jesus Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Joey_De_Jesus reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 00:37, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy
Hello Zefrrr, hope all is well and that you are staying safe. Your recent revisions have raised suspicion of not following Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Please adhere to Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view. "All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic."

"NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia projects. It is also one of Wikipedia's three core content policies; the other two are "Verifiability" and "No original research". These policies jointly determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and, because they work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another. Editors are strongly encouraged to familiarize themselves with all three."

"This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus."

Please follow the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, as we are all trying to create a free, accurate, and unbiased encyclopedia for all.

Jennifer Rajkumar
Hello, can you please explain what did you revert my edit on Jennifer page without any explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbrooks89 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  12:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Manure. You wrote one candidate's article and then you showed up as an IP to add negative material on one they are running against. "most of my edits were reverting what seemed to be whitewashing attempts" No. You added negative material as an IP and then used your IP to revert and then used your account, too. All of this after having your draft declined twice as political advocacy but you did a runaround the next day to create the article anyway. Wikipedia does not want you nor your contributions. It is not possible to impart integrity to someone that does not have it. "the IP socking was just due to not having logged in to wikipedia across browsers and was fully unintentional." Utter bullshit and any checkuser will see that you used the same browser. We don't want your kind...it is like the Russian assholes that tampered in the last election. No thanks.

Concern regarding Draft:Joey De Jesus
Hello, Zefrrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joey De Jesus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joey De Jesus


Hello, Zefrrr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joey De Jesus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)