User talk:ZeiZai6Y

Speedy deletion of EJBCA
A tag has been placed on EJBCA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. X Marx The Spot (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * We really need to have some sources for articles on Wikipedia. Do you have any news articles or other coverage about this project? I notice the first release is listed as late 2001; even something from back then would work. Without sources, I'm afraid this article might end up deleted. If that's the case, you could work on a copy in a sandbox under your username. If it comes to that, I'll be happy to set that up for you. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The Speedy-Deletion tag has been removed from the article. I did some copyediting, so it's less promotional now - but it still needs to show why it is a notable software package. Please add any references you have. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thnx a lot! I'll dig up bunch.

Nomination of EJBCA for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EJBCA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EJBCA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anton.bersh (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of EJBCA for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EJBCA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EJBCA& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EpicPupper 19:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)