User talk:Zeke5044

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marsh Chapel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. noq (talk) 10:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm -noah-. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marsh Chapel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Noah  💬 17:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Second warning regarding your unconstructive edits. Seasider53 (talk) 11:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Marsh Chapel
Hello, The way you measured Marsh Chapel accounted for the stairs of Marsh Chapel. The official measurement of Marsh Chapel doesn't appear to account for the steps. You used angle guns to measure the height of Marsh Chapel, which are only reliable to a certain extent. Noah 💬 17:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boston University Academy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boston University Academy was changed by Zeke5044 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867267 on 2021-11-25T18:39:16+00:00

Your recent editing history at Boston University Academy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Regarding your edits at Boston University Academy: I strongly suggest that you do not attempt to re-add the student activities section. Instead, please engage in discussion at the article's talk page about why the section is appropriate. Based on other schools' articles, a simple list of clubs is probably appropriate. —C.Fred (talk) 18:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Green Island Design
Hello Zeke5044,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Green Island Design for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bowman elementary school


A tag has been placed on Bowman elementary school requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lexingtonma.org/bowman-elementary/about/who-we-are/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bbb23 (talk) 00:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

ANI
ANI-notice Noah  💬 13:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice
Since the other guy's ANI notice failed to materialize, I guess I'll have to do it.

Basically, you're on the wrong side of an incident report over at the Administrator's Noticeboard. Possible risks include being blocked or even banned. If you go over there now, you might be able to defend yourself (or at the very least, avoid a block or ban).

Scroll down until you see a header titled "Zeke5044 adding non-notable information about schools". At the moment, it's at the bottom of the page, but this may change as new reports are sent in.

Good luck! ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  14:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Boston university academy clubs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boston university academy clubs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Boston university academy clubs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dexxtrall (talk) 18:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * Spend the next month studying Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cullen328 (talk) 00:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)